Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
2023-2025
Action Plan 6
Albania’s sixth action plan has broadened the range of policy areas and public institutions engaged in the OGP process. The establishment of the Multi-Stakeholder Committee addresses a long-standing IRM recommendation to institutionalize cooperation between the public administration and civil society in the OGP process. As many commitments are awareness-raising activities, institutions could add value by collaborating with civil society and incorporating measurements of their results during implementation. (More)
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
After 10 years, the IRM is adapting the target and timing of recommendations. Let’s look at how IRM recommendations have evolved over time, what to expect from...
Point of Contact
2024, IRM Report, Web page
2024, Report Comments, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2023, Action Plan, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2022, Self Assessment, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2020, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Report Comments, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close