Skip Navigation

Slovak Republic

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 6

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2024-2026

Action Plan 6

  • Number of Commitments: 7
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

The Slovak Republic’s fifth action plan includes promising commitments on strengthening the protection of whistleblowers and expanding the number of companies disclosing beneficial ownership information. Existing data control mechanisms will need to be well-resourced to cope with the expectation of rapid beneficial ownership data disclosure. The action plan was adopted by the newly created Multi-Stakeholder Forum (MSF) dedicated to the OGP process.

The Slovak Republic’s fifth action plan covers six policy areas and builds upon work achieved on whistleblower protection, education for participatory policy-making, open data, capacity-building, public participation in the legislative process, and beneficial ownership transparency. (More)

The Slovak Republic has delivered their 2024-2026 action plan.

OpenStories for OGP site

OpenStories

Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.

Contact

Point of Contact

Linda Zuzčáková Advisor at the Office of the Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development Linda.Zuzcakova@minv.sk

Commitments

Resources

  1. Slovak Republic End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2022-2024

    2024, Self Assessment, Web page

  2. Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2024-2026 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Slovak Republic Action Plan 2024-2026 (June)

    2024, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Final Learning Exercise- Action Plan 2021-2022 – Banská Bystrica

    2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page

  5. Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2022-2024

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  6. End of Commitment Report – Creation of the open government strategy for the city of Banská Bystrica

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  7. End of Commitment Report – Application of open government in processes of spatial planning, strategic planning, and environmental management

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  8. Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  9. Inception Report – Action plan – Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, 2021 – 2022

    2022, Inception Report, Web page

  10. Action plan – Žilina (Region), Slovak Republic, 2022 – 2026

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  11. Slovak Republic Action Plan 2022-2024 (June)

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  12. Žilina (Region) – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  13. Slovak Republic Transitional Results Report 2019-2021

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Slovak Republic – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  15. Slovak Republic Transitional Results Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  16. Action plan – Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, 2021 – 2022

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  17. Banska-Bystrica – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  18. Slovakia Design Report 2019-2021

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  19. Slovakia Design Report 2019–2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  20. Slovakia Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  21. Slovakia Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  22. Slovak Republic Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  23. Slovak Republic Design Report 2017–2019

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  24. Slovak Republic Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  25. Slovak Republic Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2017-2019

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  26. Slovak Republic Special Accountability Report 2015-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Slovak Republic National Action Plan 2017-2019

    2017, Action Plan, Web page

  28. Slovak Republic End of Term Self Assessment 2015

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  29. Slovak Republic End of Term Self Assessment 2012-13

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  30. Case Study – Slovak Republic

    2015, Case Study, Web page

  31. Slovak Republic First Action Plan

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  32. Slovak Republic IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  33. Slovak Republic Second Action Plan 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  34. Bringing Government Data into the Light: Slovakia’s Open Data Initiative, 2011-2015

    2015, Web page

Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
Action Plan 2
3
0
3
Action Plan 3
7
0
0
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.00 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.00 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.67 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.00 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.50 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.20 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.76 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.07 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.50 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.60 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.88 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.24 Sources

Recent Posts

Beneficial Ownership money
Nigeria · Armenia · Mexico · Latvia · Kenya · United Kingdom · Norway · Slovak Republic

Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group: Impact, Achievements, and Future Directions

Launched in 2019, the Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group (or the Leadership Group) set out to advance global policy toward open beneficial ownership (BO) data, and achieve concrete progress by 2023. This summary examines the group's achievements, lessons learned by Open Ownership and the Open Government Partnership from co-convening the group, and future directions to advance BO reform.

[Crop 1]-What’s-in-2019-APs-Cover-Illustration
Slovak Republic

Featured Commitment: Publish Beneficial Ownership Data

Read how the Slovak Republic is expanding their beneficial ownership work. This commitment is featured in the "What's in the 2019 Action Plans" publication.

Show More
Open Government Partnership