Skip Navigation

Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Member Since 2014
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 10
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s second action plan contains three promising commitments on developing an open data portal, publishing public procurement data, and enhancing the transparency of government funding for media and civil society. However, political crises adversely affected adoption of the action plan. Ongoing engagement of the multistakeholder forum despite such crises would encourage implementation and ensure oversight in collaboration with civil society. (More)

Contact

Point of Contact

Selma Džihanović-Gratz Head of the Department for Providing Legal Aid to Civil Society, Ministry of Justice selma.dzihanovic@mpr.gov.ba

Commitments

Resources

  1. Bosnia and Herzegovina Co-Creation Brief 2024

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Bosnia and Herzegovina Action Plan Review 2022–2024

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Bosnia and Herzegovina Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Bosnia and Herzegovina Action Plan 2022-2024 (December)

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina Transitional Results Report 2019-2021

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Bosnia and Herzegovina Transitional Results Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Bosnia and Herzegovina – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  8. Bosnia and Herzegovina Design Report 2019-2021

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Bosnia and Herzegovina Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Bosnia and Herzegovina Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  11. Bosnia and Herzegovina – Notification of inactivity status – December 2018

    2019, Letter, Web page

  12. Bosnia and Herzogovina – Steering Committee Resolution (December 5, 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  13. Bosnia and Herzegovina – Letter from Minister of Justice to OGP CEO (December 2017)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  14. Bosnia and Herzogovina – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  15. OGP Letter – Bosnia and Herzegovina – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  16. Bosnia and Herzogovina Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  17. OGP Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina Regarding Shift to ‘Odd Year’ Action Plan Schedule: January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  18. OGP Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2015

    2017, Letter, Web page

  19. OGP Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  20. OGP Letter – Bosnia and Herzegovina – January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  21. Late Letter November2016 – Bosnia-Herzegovina

    2016, Letter, Web page

  22. Bosnia and Herzegovina Letter (Jan 7, 2016)

    2016, Letter, Web page

  23. OGP Letter – Bosnia – Nov. 15

    2015, Letter, Web page

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.04 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.88 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.03 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.77 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.59 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.34 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.00 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.87 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.40 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.28 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.36 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.28 Sources

Recent Posts

Show More
Open Government Partnership