Skip Navigation

Chile

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 6


 
Chile has joined the Open Gov Challenge with four commitments.
 

| Learn More »

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2027

Action Plan 6

  • Number of Commitments: 11
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Contact

Valeria Lübbert Executive Secretary of the Public Integrity and Transparency Commission, Ministry General Secretariat of the Presidency vlubbert@minsegpres.gob.cl

Commitments


Resources

  1. Chile Action Plan 2023-2027 (December)

    2024, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Chile Results Report 2020-2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Chile Self-Assessment Report 2020-2022

    2023, Self Assessment, Web page

  4. Chile Results Report 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Action plan – Maipú, Chile, 2023 – 2024

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Chile – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  7. Request for extension of 2022 action plan delivery – Maipú

    2022, Web page

  8. Inception Report – Action plan – Peñalolén, Chile, 2021 – 2024

    2022, Inception Report, Web page

  9. Chile Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Maipú – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  11. Chile Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Action plan – Peñalolén, Chile, 2021 – 2024

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Chile Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Chile Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Chile Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  16. Chile Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Peñalolén – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  18. Chile Action Plan 2020-2022

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Chile End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. Chile Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  21. Chile End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Chile End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  23. Chile Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Document, PDF

  24. Chile Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Chile_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  26. Chile Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Chile_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018_Comments-Received.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  28. Chile_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018_for-public-comment.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  29. Chile Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  30. OGP_reportcard_Chile_Jan2018.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  31. Chile_Plan-de-accion-de-Congreso-Nacional_2017-2018.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  32. OGP Report Card – Chile (2018)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  33. Chile_Mid-term_Self-Assessment-Report_2016-2018_ES.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  34. Chile Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  35. U4-Report-2015-02-Chile.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  36. Chile End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  37. Chile_EoT-Report_2014-2016_for-pub-comment_ENG_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  38. case-study_Chile_Lobby-Law_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  39. Chile_Informe-Autoevaluacion-fin-de-termino_Plan-de-Accion2014-2016_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  40. Chile_Comentarios_Recibidos_0_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  41. Chile_IRM_2014-15_0_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  42. Chile_SC_2015_Letter[1]_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  43. Chile_Plan-de-Accion_2016-2018.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  44. Chile_2012_Eng_Unofficial_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  45. Chile_Final_2012_1_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  46. Chile_SC_2015_Letter.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  47. Chile End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  48. Case Study: Chile Lobby Law

    2016, Case Study, Web page

  49. Lobby Law in Chile: Democratizing Access to Public Authorities

    2016, Research Product, Web page

  50. Chile Informe Autoevaluación Fin de Término – Plan de Acción 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  51. Chile Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  52. Chile Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  53. Chile Action Plan 2012

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  54. Chile Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  55. Chile Self Assessment Report 2012

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  56. Chile Plan de Acción 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  57. Chile, Informe de Autoevaluacion Medio Termino, 2014-16

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  58. Open government and transparency reform in Chile: Balancing leadership, ambition, and implementation capacity

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  59. The social impact of open data in the global south

    2015, Web page

  60. OGP-Chile-infographic

    OGP Chile infographic

    2013, Document, PNG

  61. Case Study (2013): Bringing Government Closer to Citizens in Chile

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  62. Chile Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2011, Letter, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
Action Plan 2
4
0
3
Action Plan 3
4
1
2
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Felipe Pino – Voices of Open Gov

To Protect the Environment, Protect the Defenders

In this episode, Felipe Pino, an environmental lawyer from Chile, shares his insight environmental democracy, the need for public participation in responding to climate crises, and the significance of the Escazu Agreement.

Chile beneficial ownership

Building a Beneficial Ownership Registry Proposal for Chile

One of the key challenges that states face is promoting sustainable economic growth through competitiveness and efficiency. Economists and businessmen have developed tools and strategies to address market distortions and maximize social wellbeing. But citizens and civil society have largely…

GLOW Indonesia

GLOW: Open Parliaments Prove Their Strength In An Unprecedented Year

From the COVID-19 pandemic to the heightening climate crisis to an increase in authoritarian overreach, 2020 has sorely tested the strength of democracies globally. Even while the world continues to reel from the effects of these multiple threats, at least…

high school boy and girl at computer

How Open Educational Resources can Help OGP Initiatives

Currently we face both a swell of support for open educational resources (OER) and devastating upheaval of our traditional education systems...

tim-mossholder-g5OZvQ48e_U-unsplash

A New Order for Civil Society Organizations?

Amid uncertainty over the advance of COVID-19, the only thing for sure is that nothing, or very little, will stay the same.

Show More
Open Government Partnership