Skip Navigation

Colombia

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5


 
Colombia has joined the Open Gov Challenge with four commitments.
 

| Learn More »

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 24
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

El quinto plan de acción de Colombia se centra en las áreas de gobernanza pública, participación ciudadana, Estado Abierto con perspectiva de género, parlamento y justicia abiertas. Se destaca la colaboración con la sociedad civil y el apoyo de OGP para la cocreación del plan, así como la necesidad de fortalecer los compromisos para alcanzar las metas propuestas. Para la implementación del plan se recomienda identificar obstáculos y buenas prácticas tempranamente y continuar fomentando la colaboración entre las agencias implementadoras y la sociedad civil. (More)


Contact

Diego Ramírez Leader in International Affairs, Secretariat of Transparency diegoramirez@presidencia.gov.co

Commitments


Resources

  1. Colombia Action Plan Review 2023-2025

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Colombia Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Colombia Action Plan 2023-2025 (December)

    2024, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Colombia Results Report 2020-2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Colombia Co-Creation Brief 2023

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Colombia Results Report 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Inception Report – Action plan – Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, 2022 – 2023

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  8. Colombia – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  9. Action plan – Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, 2022 – 2023

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  10. Manizales – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  11. Cartagena de Indias – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  12. Colombia Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Colombia Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Action plan – Bogotá, Colombia, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  15. Colombia Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Colombia Design Report 2017-2019

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Colombia Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  18. Bogotá – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  19. Colombia Action Plan 2020-2022

    2020, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Colombia Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  21. Colombia – Cohort Shift Letter – February 2020

    2020, Letter, Web page

  22. Colombia End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2017-2019

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Nariño, Colombia Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  24. Nariño, Colombia – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  25. Colombia End-of-Term Report 2015-2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  26. Colombia End-of-Term Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  27. Nariño, Colombia – Letter of Intent to Join OGP (March 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  28. OGP Report Card – Colombia (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  29. Colombia End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2015-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  30. Colombia Action Plan 2017-2019

    2017, Action Plan, Web page

  31. Colombia Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  32. Colombia Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  33. Colombia Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2015-2017 (Español)

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  34. Colombia Action Plan 2014-2015

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  35. Colombia Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  36. Colombia, Second Action Plan, 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
Action Plan 2
11
1
7
Action Plan 3
6
2
0
Action Plan 4
0
0
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Colombia – LegalApp #1 – Credit-Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho, Colombia

Making Justice Work For You

To deal with a justice system that was complicated, Colombia’s Ministry of Justice developed the mobile application LegalApp, providing free legal knowledge and access to its public, presented in accessible language.

Show More
Open Government Partnership