Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
2022-2024
Action Plan 5
Greece’s fifth action plan includes promising commitments on lobbying regulation, whistleblower protection and open land administration data. While there were improvements to the co-creation process compared to the previous action plan cycle, the brief timeframe limited the opportunities for civil society organizations (CSOs) to develop the action plan with the government. Greater dialogue between government and civil society during implementation would strengthen the OGP process and help achieve stronger results. (More)
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Most open gov commitments from Southern European countries are more ambitious than the European average, but there are several areas they could improve. Explore this regional snapshot to learn more.
Point of Contact
2024, IRM Report, Web page
2024, Letter, Web page
2024, Letter, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Action Plan, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Resource, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2013, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how OGP members are maximizing the transparency and accountability of the court system.
Currently we face both a swell of support for open educational resources (OER) and devastating upheaval of our traditional education systems...
Actualmente estamos observando un gran apoyo a los recursos educativos abiertos (REA) y al mismo tiempo un trastorno devastador de nuestros sistemas educativos tradicionales...
“Using low cost open technologies to achieve high impact.” This motto has been inspiring the work of my organisation, GFOSS – the Open Technologies Alliance in Greece. Our view on Open Government derives from the need to have access to…
Achieving Goal 16 of the Sustainable Development Goals through Open Government Methods Open Governance as a public policy is based on the integration of the principles of transparency, access to information and the effective participation of citizens in the State’s operating…
A series providing a round-up of media attention received by the Open Government Partnership throughout the world. Current President of the United States, Barack Obama, mentioned OGP in remarks delivered at the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center in Athens, Greece,…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close