Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting
The 2022 OGP Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting is taking place on November 1-3 in Marrakech, Morocco.
Current Action Plan
2023-2025
Action Plan 5
- Number of Commitments: 15
- Policy Area Focus: Not specified
Tunisia’s fourth action plan achieved modest early results, with most progress in opening up governance at the municipal level. The E-Government Unit of the Presidency, civil society steering committee members, international partners, and engaged municipalities were key drivers of reforms. Significant political shifts and government reorganization inhibited implementation of many of the action plan’s most ambitious elements. (More)
Tunisia has delivered its 2023-2025 action plan.
Why Open Budgets, Contracts, and Ownership are Critical to Delivering Public Services in Africa
Now is the time for governments to invest in reforms that can accelerate and improve how they deliver quality education, healthcare, water and sanitation, and supportive infrastructure.
Creating OGP’s Future Together – Strategic Planning 2023-2028
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Contact
Point of Contact
Sana Oueslati
Public Services Advisor, Acting General Director of E-Government Unit, Presidency of the Government of Tunisia
sana.oueslati@pm.gov.tn
Resources
-
Tunisia Results Report 2021–2023
2024, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia Results Report 2021-2023 – For Public Comment
2024, Report Comments, Web page
-
Tunisia Action Plan 2023-2025 (December)
2024, Action Plan, Web page
-
Inception Report – Action plan – El Kef, Tunisia, 2021 – 2023
2023, Inception Report, Web page
-
Tunisia Co-Creation Brief 2023
2023, IRM Report, Web page
-
Action plan – Carthage, Tunisia, 2022 – 2023
2022, Action Plan, Web page
-
Tunisia – Eligibility Review Letter (September 2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
-
Carthage – Letter of Support (2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
-
Tunisia Action Plan Review 2021-2023
2022, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment
2022, Report Comments, Web page
-
Action plan – El Kef, Tunisia, 2021 – 2023
2021, Action Plan, Web page
-
Action plan – Regueb, Tunisia, 2021 – 2023
2021, Action Plan, Web page
-
Tunisia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia Action Plan 2021-2023
2021, Action Plan, Web page
-
Tunisia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Tunisia Design Report 2018-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia – Under Review Letter (July 2021)
2021, Letter, Web page
-
Tunisia – Letter Regarding Eligibility (September 2020)
2021, Letter, Web page
-
Regueb – Letter of Support
2021, Letter, Web page
-
El Kef – Letter of Support
2021, Letter, Web page
-
Tunisia Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018
2020, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
-
Tunisia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018
2020, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
-
Tunisia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
-
OGP Letter – Tunisia – July 2017
2018, Letter, Web page
-
Tunisia Mid-Term Self Assessment 2016-2018
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016
2017, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment
2017, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia Second National Action Plan 2016-2018
2016, Action Plan, Web page
-
Tunisia End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2014-2016
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Tunisia IRM Progress Report 2014-2015
2016, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia First IRM Progress Report – Public Comments Received
2016, IRM Report, Web page
-
Tunisia, First Action Plan, 2014-16
2015, Action Plan, Web page
-
Tunisia Mid Term Self Assessment 2014-16 (English)
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Local Collaboration and Implementation in Tunisia and Morocco
“One of the most favorable outcomes of encouraging collaboration between civil society organizations and the Regional Council is improved communication,” reflected a Moroccan civil society leader at the conclusion of Béni Mellal-Khénifra region’s open government reform co-creation process. Since 2016,…
Faces of Open Government: David Wuyep and Aysha Karafi
Rostros del Gobierno Abierto: David Wuyep y Aysha Karafi
Les visages du gouvernement ouvert : David Wuyep et Aysha Karafi
For Faces of Open Government, we sit down with two members of The Open Government Leadership Collaborative. See insights on their new year goals in open gov, and how the cohort has helped strengthen their leadership capacities.
Para "Las caras del gobierno abierto", nos sentamos con dos miembros de la Open Government Leadership Collaborative. Descubra sus objetivos para el nuevo año en materia de gobierno abierto y cómo la cohorte les ha ayudado a desarrollar su capacidad de liderazgo.
Pour les visages du gouvernement ouvert, nous nous sommes assis avec deux membres de l'Open Government Leadership Collaborative. Découvrez leurs objectifs pour la nouvelle année en matière de gouvernement ouvert et comment la cohorte a contribué à renforcer leurs capacités de leadership.
Civic Space as a Key Prerequisite of Open Government Reforms in the MENA Region
Since joining OGP, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia have made over 129 commitments. These have included strong commitments on improving access to public information and open data, but when it comes to implementing commitments both Jordan and Tunisia fall behind other OGP members, and the results of Morocco’s first OGP action plan have yet to be assessed by the IRM...
Bringing New Voices into OGP Action Plans: Stories from the Field
In this new series, OGP Multi-Donor Trust Fund recipients share their challenges and successes in making OGP co-creation processes more collaborative and inclusive.
Bringing Democracy to the People, One Municipality at a Time – Tunisia
"You know, since the revolution, no one has taken the initiative to listen to us. It was only shortly after the uprising that we lost hope that things would change for the better. Today, for the first time since then,…