OGP Data Dashboard
Access data on OGP commitments. Filter commitments by location, policy area, and year in the Explore tab. Search by keyword in the Search tab.
Last Updated: 2:55pm 08 May 2025 UTC
Member Map
77
Countries152
Local478
Action Plans5604
Commitments77
Countries327
Action Plans5043
Commitments152
Local151
Action Plans561
CommitmentsWhat is this showing?
This map shows OGP members. Shaded areas are OGP countries and points are OGP local members. Click on members to see when they joined and how many action plans/commitments they have submitted.
How is this calculated?
OGP members include active members, inactive members, and members under review. The map only shows members that have submitted at least one OGP action plan. Note: the map may show borders that do not reflect OGP institutional policy.
Trending Policy Areas
OGP members address various policy areas in their action plans. Hover over the examples below to see how many members are addressing each area.
What is this showing?
This section shows examples of policy areas that OGP members are addressing in their action plans. These are not exhaustive or representative of the diverse set of reforms included in OGP action plans.
How is this calculated?
The numbers shown are the total number of submitted OGP commitments relevant to each policy area. Hover over each policy area to see the number of OGP members that have made those commitments.
Commitment Performance
This section shows the average performance of all assessed OGP commitments according to three key metrics from the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM).
44%
of 4756
have the potential to change the status quo
59%
of 3307
are substantially or fully completed
15%
of 3344
have made government significantly more open
What is this showing?
This section shows the average performance of all OGP commitments according to three key metrics: ambition, completion, and early results.
Why is this data helpful?
The three metrics help to show how many OGP commitments are making a difference. These global numbers also serve as a benchmark for performance.
How is this calculated?
The percentages represent the number of commitments that meet each criteria (e.g. ambitious), divided by the total number of commitments assessed on that metric. See the terms below for details. Note: given the nature of reporting by OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM), not all commitments have been assessed on each metric.
Terms to know
Top-Performing Policy Areas
This section shows the top-performing policy areas according to key OGP metrics.
What is this showing?
This section shows the top-performing policy areas according to key OGP metrics.
Why is this data helpful?
This section shows where OGP commitments are currently making the biggest difference. There may be specific commitments in these areas that members of the OGP community can learn from and apply in their contexts.
How is this calculated?
Fastest-growing: Each policy area’s growth rate is its rate of adoption in current vs. previous plans. Rate of adoption refers to the number of action plans with at least one commitment in the relevant policy area out of all action plans during the time period. Current action plans refers to plans currently being implemented (e.g. 2020, 2021, and 2022 plans for the year 2022).
Other metrics: Each policy area’s rate is the number of commitments that meet the criteria (e.g. ambitious), divided by the total number of assessed commitments related to that policy area. See the terms below for details.
Terms to know
Performance by Policy Area
OGP members make commitments across a variety of policy areas. Use this table to sort policy areas by number of members with a relevant commitment, total number of commitments, and other performance metrics.
| Policy Area | Members | Total Commitments | Ambitious | Complete | Early Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access to Justice | 49 |
135 |
35%40/113 |
60%46/77 |
10%8/77 |
| Anti-Corruption and Integrity | 110 |
872 |
49%386/783 |
58%313/536 |
15%83/539 |
| Asset Disclosure | 32 |
67 |
52%34/65 |
55%26/47 |
9%4/47 |
| Automated Decision-Making, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence | 22 |
37 |
31%9/29 |
74%14/19 |
5%1/20 |
| Beneficial Ownership | 38 |
83 |
58%46/80 |
54%30/56 |
14%8/57 |
| Civic Space | 54 |
143 |
42%55/131 |
55%50/91 |
7%6/92 |
| Climate Finance | 12 |
12 |
33%2/6 |
17%1/6 |
NR |
| Climate Mitigation and Adaptation | 43 |
67 |
31%13/42 |
69%22/32 |
16%5/32 |
| Democratizing Decision-Making | 130 |
728 |
48%303/629 |
63%309/492 |
17%83/496 |
| Digital Governance | 51 |
116 |
25%24/95 |
68%34/50 |
6%3/53 |
| Education | 75 |
257 |
37%82/221 |
52%95/181 |
11%20/182 |
| Elections | 35 |
58 |
33%17/52 |
59%23/39 |
15%6/39 |
| Environment and Climate | 89 |
231 |
42%71/170 |
61%75/122 |
17%21/124 |
| Extractive Industries | 54 |
180 |
61%97/160 |
54%66/122 |
25%31/122 |
| Fiscal Openness | 118 |
773 |
55%372/676 |
63%344/544 |
21%114/547 |
| Freedom of Assembly | 6 |
8 |
38%3/8 |
50%2/4 |
25%1/4 |
| Freedom of Association | 31 |
60 |
28%15/53 |
46%18/39 |
3%1/39 |
| Freedom of Expression | 22 |
40 |
46%16/35 |
44%8/18 |
6%1/18 |
| Gender | 78 |
258 |
43%89/206 |
51%73/144 |
15%21/144 |
| Gender-Based Violence | 20 |
31 |
50%12/24 |
58%11/19 |
11%2/19 |
| Health | 68 |
226 |
37%71/194 |
64%101/158 |
14%22/158 |
| Inclusion | 140 |
653 |
36%180/494 |
53%190/356 |
10%37/360 |
| International Environmental Agreements | 20 |
29 |
52%13/25 |
63%10/16 |
13%2/16 |
| Justice | 69 |
352 |
41%128/313 |
59%132/222 |
17%39/225 |
| Legislation | 75 |
406 |
57%212/370 |
53%141/264 |
15%41/265 |
| Lobbying | 22 |
37 |
60%18/30 |
78%18/23 |
26%6/23 |
| Local Commitments | 178 |
1116 |
48%300/622 |
64%329/514 |
17%89/518 |
| Mainstreaming Participation | 60 |
90 |
21%11/52 |
50%1/2 |
NR |
| Open Contracting | 71 |
150 |
60%82/137 |
53%58/109 |
19%21/109 |
| Open Data | 118 |
1187 |
50%525/1057 |
68%574/848 |
20%169/854 |
| Open Justice | 47 |
183 |
45%78/172 |
64%80/125 |
22%28/127 |
| Open Parliaments | 55 |
182 |
45%66/147 |
58%78/135 |
12%17/138 |
| People with Disabilities | 71 |
164 |
35%43/123 |
51%40/78 |
9%7/79 |
| Political Integrity | 18 |
27 |
46%12/26 |
57%12/21 |
24%5/21 |
| Public Procurement | 89 |
318 |
54%150/277 |
57%109/192 |
19%37/192 |
| Public Service Delivery | 143 |
749 |
38%230/610 |
58%274/475 |
13%62/477 |
| Right to Information | 83 |
354 |
50%154/309 |
62%135/217 |
18%39/218 |
| Water and Sanitation | 49 |
78 |
61%36/59 |
53%27/51 |
22%11/51 |
| Whistleblower Protections | 36 |
73 |
57%37/65 |
63%31/49 |
18%9/49 |
| Youth | 94 |
238 |
34%53/157 |
50%62/124 |
6%8/125 |
Overall |
187 |
5604 |
44% |
59% |
15% |
What is this showing?
This table highlights commitment performance rates by policy area. For each policy area, the columns show the number of members that have made at least one relevant commitment, the total number of commitments, the ambition rate, completion rate, and early results rate.
Why is this data helpful?
This table shows how policy areas rank according to performance metrics. Policy areas with strong performance scores indicate where OGP members have had the most success. Low scores show where more work is needed.
How is this calculated?
Each performance rate is the number of commitments that meet the criteria (e.g. ambitious), divided by the total number of commitments related to that policy area. Each rate is shown as both a percentage and a fraction. Note: given the nature of IRM reporting, not all commitments have been assessed on each metric. See the terms below for details.
Terms to know
Policy Areas Explained
This section describes some of the key areas that OGP members address in their action plans.
Beneficial Ownership
Beneficial ownership transparency involves collecting and disclosing information about the real human beings who own and control companies and other corporate vehicles. Collecting and publicly disclosing company beneficial ownership data can help reveal money laundering, conflicts of interest, improperly awarded government contracts, and tax evasion. Beyond corruption, knowing who ultimately owns or benefits from a company can also help to identify responsibility for other violations of law, such as environment or labor rules.
TOP POLICY AREAS
83
Commitments
Civic Space
A free and active civil society is key to ensuring that institutions are open, accountable, and responsive. OGP members are working to promote and protect basic democratic freedoms, such as freedom of expression, assembly, and association, and media freedom.
TOP POLICY AREAS
143
Commitments
Climate Finance
Preventing the worst effects of human-induced climate change requires moving finance away from greenhouse gas-intensive activities toward activities that lower environmental and human impacts and build resilience. This shift will require changes in public and private finance, and will need to happen at the international, national, and local levels. Though progress in increasing climate finance flows has grown over the past decade, they are not yet on track to meet the challenge, and they risk being wasted without adequate safeguards.
OGP members can use their action plans to include environmental goals into fiscal and planning processes and ensure climate-related programs and projects across borders and in their own countries are implemented well. Open government approaches can help shine a light on the nature of the problems and the scale of the solutions. By introducing more public oversight, governments and members of the public can gain confidence that money is going where it is supposed to, neither wasted nor embezzled. Introducing more opportunities for participation in the fiscal planning process also helps direct funds to better target public priorities. By making climate financial flows more inclusive, governments can better ensure that the most vulnerable become more resilient to the effects of climate change.
TOP POLICY AREAS
12
Commitments
Digital Governance
116
Commitments
Environment and Climate
Climate change is an incredibly complex challenge affecting everyone. Open government practices enable governments and citizens to see the true costs of pollution, discuss and co-create alternative approaches for national socio-economic development, mitigate and adapt to climate change, and ensure that there is adequate public oversight of environment and climate policies and spending.
TOP POLICY AREAS
231
Commitments
Fiscal Openness
Making budgets open to public input ensures that government planning and spending align with public priorities and enables societal scrutiny. This includes publishing fiscal information in plain language and accessible formats and increasing participation and oversight in budgeting.
773
Commitments
Inclusion
Inclusion is fundamental to achieving more equitable, representative, and accountable policies that truly serve everyone. OGP members are advancing inclusion throughout open government initiatives, whether by championing innovative gender-specific reforms, engaging youth communities in co-creation processes, or integrating the voices of minorities and vulnerable groups across various themes and commitments.
653
Commitments
Justice
OGP members use open government approaches to address barriers that prevent people from having their justice needs met, empower them to understand their legal problems, and seek help through fair and impartial processes in formal and informal institutions.
352
Commitments
Open Contracting
One in every three dollars spent by governments is on contracts. People should know how well this money is being spent, which can be achieved through open contracting. Opening up the public procurement process can improve government efficiency and effectiveness, which includes combating corruption. However, governments publish open data on approximately less than three percent of the billions spent on public contracts. When paired with greater public scrutiny and accountability, open contracting principles and data practices can save money, improve public service delivery, and increase competition.
TOP POLICY AREAS
150
Commitments
Open Parliaments
An open parliament – one that encourages transparency, participation, and accountability both within the parliamentary institution and throughout government – is an essential part of an open government.
182
Commitments
Public Service Delivery
OGP members can enhance health, education, and other public services by improving transparency and engaging citizens to increase accountability.
749
Commitments
What is this showing?
This section describes some of the key areas that OGP members address in their action plans. Click on the link at the bottom of the section to learn more about OGP policy areas.
How is this calculated?
The number of commitments shown for each policy area represents the total number of OGP commitments made related to that area. See the OGP Glossary for detailed definitions of all terms shown.
About the Data
All data shown on the Dashboard is derived from member action plans and assessments by OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM). The data is updated daily and available for download here. See the OGP Glossary for detailed definitions of all terms shown.
OGP Explore
Combine the filters below to explore relevant commitments by location, policy area, and year
Commitment Map
5604 Commitments by all members
77
Countries152
Local478
Action Plans5604
Commitments77
Countries327
Action Plans5043
Commitments152
Local151
Action Plans561
CommitmentsWhat is this showing?
This map shows OGP members that have made at least one commitment that meets the selected filters. Click on members to see when they joined and how many of their action plans and commitments match the selected filters.
How is this calculated?
OGP members include active members, inactive members, and members under review. Note: the map may show borders that do not reflect OGP institutional policy.
Commitment Performance
5604 Commitments by all members
Select a filter at the top to see commitment performance
What is this showing?
This section shows the number and performance of OGP commitments that meet the selected filters.
Why is this data helpful?
These numbers help to show how many OGP commitments are making a difference, and how the selected commitments compare to the global average.
How is this calculated?
The percentages represent the number of commitments that meet each criteria (e.g. ambitious), divided by the total number of commitments assessed on that metric. See the terms below for details. Global averages refer to the performance of all commitments on that metric, as seen in the Basics tab. Note: given the nature of reporting by OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM), not all commitments have been assessed on each metric.
Terms to know
Policy Area Growth Over Time
5604 Commitments by all members
Select a policy area and multiple members at the top to see trends
What is this showing?
Once a policy area is selected at the top of the page, this graph shows the percentage of members actively implementing at least one relevant commitment over time.
Why is this data helpful?
This graph shows the trend in adoption of policy areas in OGP action plans. This reveals areas of growing focus and those that have seen declining attention.
How is this calculated?
The percentage of members for each time period represents the total number of members that submitted at least one relevant commitment, out of the total number of members that submitted an action plan. Because members typically submit action plans every other year, the percentages are shown as two-year rolling averages to account for fluctuations in the set of countries that submit an action plan each year.
Commitment List
5604 Commitments by all members
- Select
| Country/Locality | Year | Commitment Title | More |
|---|
What is this showing?
This table shows all commitments that match the filters selected at the top of the page. At least one filter must be selected to populate this table. Use the tags above the table to further filter by commitment quality (e.g. ambitious, complete). Click on commitment titles to learn more about each commitment. Click on “Featured” icons to access stories, where available.
Why is this data helpful? (why did we choose it?)
This table enables finding existing commitments in specific policy areas, regions, and years, as well as top-performing commitments by using the built-in table filters.
How is this calculated?
The commitment performance metrics (e.g. ambitious, complete) are derived directly from IRM reports. See the terms below for details. The Year field shows the year in which the commitment was first submitted. Icons in the Featured field indicate that a story is available on the OGP website.
Terms to know
About the Data
All data shown on the Dashboard is derived from member action plans and assessments by OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM). The data is updated daily and available for download here. See the OGP Glossary for detailed definitions of all terms shown.
OGP Search
Search OGP commitments by keywords in English or Spanish. Click (+) to see commitment excerpts
Commitment List
5604 Commitments by all members
- Select
| Country/Locality | Year | Commitment Title | More |
|---|
What is this showing?
This table shows all commitments that match the filters selected at the top of the page. At least one filter must be selected to populate this table. Use the tags above the table to further filter by commitment quality (e.g. ambitious, complete). Click on commitment titles to learn more about each commitment. Click on “Featured” icons to access stories, where available.
Why is this data helpful? (why did we choose it?)
This table enables finding existing commitments in specific policy areas, regions, and years, as well as top-performing commitments by using the built-in table filters.
How is this calculated?
The commitment performance metrics (e.g. ambitious, complete) are derived directly from IRM reports. See the terms below for details. The Year field shows the year in which the commitment was first submitted. Icons in the Featured field indicate that a story is available on the OGP website.
Terms to know
This site uses cookies.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close