Netherlands Design Report 2018-2020
- Action Plan: Netherlands Action Plan 2018-2020
- Dates Under Review: 2018-2020
- Report Publication Year: 2020
The Netherlands third action planAction plans are at the core of a government’s participation in OGP. They are the product of a co-creation process in which government and civil society jointly develop commitments to open governmen... includes a diverse set of commitments, with a particular focus on local governance. Civil society provided significant input during the co-creation processCollaboration between government, civil society and other stakeholders (e.g., citizens, academics, private sector) is at the heart of the OGP process. Participating governments must ensure that a dive... through the multi-stakeholder forumRegular dialogue between government and civil society is a core element of OGP participation. It builds trust, promotes joint problem-solving, and empowers civil society to influence the design, imple..., as well as via direct consultations with relevant central or local authorities. Going forward, the OGP process in the Netherlands could benefit from more high-level political ownership and stronger synergies across commitments. The next action plan could address topics such as beneficial ownershipDisclosing beneficial owners — those who ultimately control or profit from a business — is essential for combating corruption, stemming illicit financial flows, and fighting tax evasion. Technical..., lobbyingLobbying transparency allows the public to ensure that there is diversity of participation and contribution to public decision-making. Technical specifications: Policies and actions affecting lobbying... transparencyAccording to OGP’s Articles of Governance, transparency occurs when “government-held information (including on activities and decisions) is open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the pub... More, and whistle-blower protection.
Table 1. At a glance
Participating since: 2011 |
The Open Government PartnershipThe Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a multi-stakeholder initiative focused on improving government transparency, ensuring opportunities for citizen participation in public matters, and strengthen... More (OGP) is a global partnership that brings together government reformers and civil society leaders to create action plans that make governments more inclusive, responsive, and accountable. The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM)The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) is OGP’s accountability arm and the main means of tracking progress in participating countries. The IRM provides independent, evidence-based, and objective ... monitors all action plans to ensure governments follow through on commitments. The Netherlands joined OGP in 2011. Since, the Netherlands has implemented two action plans. This report evaluates the design of the Netherland’s third action plan.
General overview of action plan
The Netherlands third action plan was co-created in a consultative process and started getting shape in the summer of 2017. Dozens of in-person meetings, as well as one online consultation, were organized with stakeholders and various sectors of society. Furthermore, the Netherlands established a multi-stakeholder forum that was involved with the development of the third plan and its subsequent monitoring and evaluation.
The action plan includes a diverse set of commitments, with a focus on open government at the local level. In addition, it explores emerging themes, such as the use of algorithms for the public good and using technology and innovation to improve government performance. The third action plan also includes one commitmentOGP commitments are promises for reform co-created by governments and civil society and submitted as part of an action plan. Commitments typically include a description of the problem, concrete action... undertaken by the Dutch parliament.
Notable commitments include work geared to improving access to information of local councils and improve the transparency around the financing of local politics. Other notable commitments include piloting digital democratic tools in a number of places and exploring if algorithms used by government can be made more open and understandable to society and piloting the Open ContractingA transparent procurement process, known as open contracting, increases competition, improves public service delivery, and ensures governments better value for their money. Technical specifications: C... Data Standard (OCDS).
Table 2. Noteworthy commitments
Commitment description | Moving forward | Status at the end of implementation cycle. |
1. Open decision-making in municipalities and provinces | This commitment plans to publish information on local councils with the goal of covering all municipalities in the Netherlands. Moving forward, civil servants could be trained in the use of the new digital tools to ensure that the level of ambitionAccording to OGP’s Articles of Governance, OGP commitments should “stretch government practice beyond its current baseline with respect to key areas of open government.” Ambition captures the po... is achieved. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
2. Local party financing | This commitment plans to improve the transparency of local political party financing. Moving forward, stakeholders could consider linking this theme to the broader discussion on the lack of financial support for local political parties in the Netherlands. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
6. Open Algorithms | This commitment aims to develop an international best practice and help understand the algorithm decision-making in government. Future work in this area could more directly address ethical dilemmas of bias. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
10. Open Contracting | This commitment aims to pilot the Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) and explore its feasibility for wider application in the Netherlands. Moving forward, the government could perform a detailed needs assessment on which specific areas of public procurementTransparency in the procurement process can help combat corruption and waste that plagues a significant portion of public procurement budgets globally. Technical specifications: Commitments that aim t... could benefit from using OCDS. It could also consider scaling up this practice for future tenders to improve transparency. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
Recommendations
The IRM recommendations aim to inform the development of the next action plan and guide implementation of the current action plan.
Table 3. Five KEY IRM Recommendations
Enhance thematic coordination and combine relevant commitments with significant overlap so that the process becomes more harmonized and coherent |
Seek higher-level political participation in the design and implementation process; frequently reach out to relevant politicians, parliamentary commissions, political party institutes, etc. |
Take action on beneficial ownership and lobby transparency |
Include relevant public bodies from special municipalities at the Dutch Caribbean |
Improve the performance of the Dutch Whistleblower Authority in accordance with the 2019 EU directive on whistleblower protection |
Downloads
- Netherlands_Design_Report_2018-2020_NL
- Netherlands_Design_Report_2018-2020_EN
- Netherlands_Design_Report_2018-2020_Comments-Received
Leave a Reply