North Macedonia Design Report 2018-2020
- Action Plan: North Macedonia Action Plan 2018-2020
- Dates Under Review: 2018-2020
- Report Publication Year: 2020
North Macedonia’s fourth action planAction plans are at the core of a government’s participation in OGP. They are the product of a co-creation process in which government and civil society jointly develop commitments to open governmen... continues to address themes such as access to information, fiscal transparencyAccording to OGP’s Articles of Governance, transparency occurs when “government-held information (including on activities and decisions) is open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the pub... More, open dataBy opening up data and making it sharable and reusable, governments can enable informed debate, better decision making, and the development of innovative new services. Technical specifications: Polici..., and openness at the local level. It also covers new topics, such as access to justiceAccessible justice systems – both formal and informal – ensure that individuals and communities with legal needs know where to go for help, obtain the help they need, and move through a system tha... More and parliamentary transparency. Moving forward, North Macedonia could establish a dedicated multi-stakeholder forumRegular dialogue between government and civil society is a core element of OGP participation. It builds trust, promotes joint problem-solving, and empowers civil society to influence the design, imple... for OGP, and continue advancing priority themes, such as open data, access to justiceTo address barriers that prevent citizens from having their justice needs met, OGP participating governments are working to expand transparency, accountability, and inclusion into all systems of justi... and beneficial ownershipDisclosing beneficial owners — those who ultimately control or profit from a business — is essential for combating corruption, stemming illicit financial flows, and fighting tax evasion. Technical... transparency.
Table 1. At a glance
Participating since: 2011 Action plan under review: Fourth Report type: Design Number of commitments: 23
Action plan development Is there a Multistakeholder forum: No Level of public influence: Involve Acted contrary to OGP process: No
Action plan design Commitments relevant to OGP values: 21 (91%) Transformative commitments: 3 (13%) Potentially starred: 3 (13%) Action plan implementation Starred commitments: N/A Completed commitments: N/A Commitments with Major DIOG*: N/A Commitments with Outstanding DIOG*: N/A
*DIOG: Did it Open Government? |
The Open Government PartnershipThe Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a multi-stakeholder initiative focused on improving government transparency, ensuring opportunities for citizen participation in public matters, and strengthen... More (OGP) is a global partnership that brings together government reformers and civil society leaders to create action plans that make governments more inclusive, responsive, and accountable. The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM)The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) is OGP’s accountability arm and the main means of tracking progress in participating countries. The IRM provides independent, evidence-based, and objective ... monitors all action plans to ensure governments follow through on commitments. North Macedonia joined OGP in 2011. Since, North Macedonia has implemented three action plans. This report evaluates the design of North Macedonia’s fourth action plan.
General overview of action plan
North Macedonia’s fourth action plan continues to address major themes from previous action plans, such as access to information, fiscal transparency, open data, and improving openness at the local level. The plan includes new policy areas, such as access to justice and commitments from the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia.
The Ministry of Information Society and Administration (MISA) continued to lead a participatory process for the fourth action plan. MISA organized several thematic meetings, working groups, and public consultations that brought together a variety of civil society and government representatives. Separately, the Assembly held consultations to develop the Open ParliamentEnsuring access to legislative information and creating mechanisms for public participation are critical to building an open, trusting relationship with citizens. Technical specifications: Commitments... commitments, which involved Assembly staff, civil society representatives, and representatives from international organizations.
Noteworthy commitments in the fourth action plan include the creation of an “open finance” database (CommitmentOGP commitments are promises for reform co-created by governments and civil society and submitted as part of an action plan. Commitments typically include a description of the problem, concrete action... 3.1) with data on all transactions disbursed by the Treasury, as well as data on the budgets of local self-governments. Additionally, Commitment 6.1 could significantly improve the legal framework around access to justice, while Commitment 6.2 could help improve access to legal services for marginalized and vulnerable communities.
Table 2. Noteworthy commitments
Commitment description | Moving forward | Status at the end of implementation cycle. |
2.1 Monitoring the property status of elected and appointed officials | This commitment aims to create an electronic submission of asset declarations. Moving forward, the IRM recommends making the data searchable according to key criteria and put in place a functional verification mechanism. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
3.1 Open treasury | This commitment will introduce an online database and web application for data on all transactions disbursed by the Treasury (“Open Finance”), including budgetary data for local self-governments. Moving forward, the IRM recommends evaluating the use of the portal to identify future improvements. The IRM also recommends specifying the level of information on expenditures and increasing the number of public bodies reporting to the portal. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
6.1 Access to justice development | This commitment primarily seeks to strengthen the legal framework around access to justice in North Macedonia. Moving forward, the IRM recommends conducting a legal needs survey to prioritize the major legal needs in the country and identify fair, cost-effective means of support. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
6.2 Improving access to justice for marginalized groups | This commitment aims to improve access to legal services and information on the legal rights for marginalized and vulnerable communities. Moving forward, the IRM recommends integrating legal services and dispute resolution mechanisms into planning and operations of vital sectors such as housing, employment, and educationAccountability within the public education system is key to improving outcomes and attainment, and accountability is nearly impossible without transparent policies and opportunities for participation .... The IRM also recommends identifying culturally appropriate means of delivering justice services to the communities. | Note: this will be assessed at the end of action plan cycle. |
Recommendations
The IRM recommendations aim to inform the development of the next action plan and guide implementation of the current action plan.
Table 3. Five KEY IRM Recommendations
Create a formal multi-stakeholder forum with clear rules and procedures and a transparent selection process for members |
Consider measures to disclose beneficial ownership in public contracts |
Improve public consultations when drafting legislationCreating and passing legislation is one of the most effective ways of ensuring open government reforms have long-lasting effects on government practices. Technical specifications: Act of creating or r... |
Continue efforts to improve access to justice through consultations with local communities |
Continue efforts on open data, building on the example of the Open Finance portal |
Leave a Reply