Skip Navigation

Ecuador Action Plan Review 2022-2024

Ecuador’s second action plan aims to create an Open State by introducing initiatives in judicial, legislative, and electoral matters, along with enhancing transparency and social control measures from the first plan. The commitments were developed through a co-creation process, representing significant progress in terms of representation and territorial reach. During implementation, it is crucial to ensure better definition of deadlines and to guarantee consistency between the public problems to be solved and the proposed activities.

Ecuador’s second action plan includes 15 commitments, organized into three thematic groups: Open State, transparency initiatives, and citizen participation and collaboration. The proposed initiatives prioritize activities aimed at open data, opportunities for participation, and innovation. While some of the commitments are considered relevant to accountability, the inclusion of activities that meet the OGP definition for said value remains an area of opportunity. This plan’s commitments are linked to the Sustainable Development Goals and the Opportunity Creation Plan 2021-2025, promoted by the central Government.

The areas of public procurement, environment, and improvement of public services come from the previous action plan. With an Open State vision, actions from the judicial and legislative bodies are now included. Of these new areas of public policy, the proposal (#2) to improve the quality of data on electoral processes and political parties also stands out, which is considered one of the promising commitments of this action plan.

The co-creation process promoted by the Groupo Núcleo[1] for this plan included virtual and in-person activities in the country’s main cities, allowing an improvement in citizen participation and the inclusion of commitments that responded to their interests and needs. Such is the case of the commitment to transparency in the fishing industry, which, as explained by the representative of Fundación Ciudadanía y Desarrollo, was proposed by civil society organizations that work on these issues in Manta, Guayaquil, and Galapagos[2].

Regarding the characteristics of the process, the representative of one of the international organizations that supports the process through financing for civil society explained that, although participation in the co-creation process was affected as a result of protests and citizen strikes against the Government, the space provided by open government allowed significant approaches for citizens who were looking for a space to be heard[3].

The representative of the Citizenship and Development Foundation considers that the territorial tables, thematic tables, both in-person and virtual, as well as the digital form for collecting proposals, allowed greater involvement, diversity, and scope in the process[4]. Both representatives agreed that having a clear methodology, financing, and support during the facilitation helped improve the quality of this plan’s co-creation process.

The Groupo Núcleo identified a responsible entity from the Government and a counterpart from civil society, academia, or the private sector. This is considered a “best practice” as it allows a definition of roles and expectations for each of the actors involved, as highlighted by the IRM in the results report of the previous cycle[5].

Regarding the commitments’ level of ambition, although significant changes were targeted in the different areas of public policy, in some cases, the activities were inconsistent with the problems they sought to address. For example, the commitment on open justice (#1) aims to promote assessments of the efficiency in the administration of justice, however, the proposed activities are limited only to the opening of data.

In other cases, there is a gap between the short-term result and the long-term vision. For commitment #3 regarding strengthening citizen participation and accountability, for example, the expected result in the short term is the creation of Citizen Training Schools, while the long-term vision is to promote citizen participation in public policy evaluation processes. In this and other instances, the established deadlines between the different activities are not identified.

Finally, the IRM identified four promising initiatives for this plan due to the opportunity to achieve significant changes in different public policy areas and the consistency between the current public problems and the proposed activities to address them. These are commitments #2, referring to information about elections and political parties; #6 regarding the creation of a portal that centralizes active and passive transparency information; #8 addressing the Government’s budget cycle and, #11 proposing the creation of a Strategy for Ethics and Integrity in Public Procurement.

[1] In Ecuador, the Groupo Núcleo works as a multi-stakeholder forum for the open government process. At the date of writing this report it consisted of the following institutions: Presidency of the Republic, Ministry of Telecommunications and the Information Society; Ministry of Production, Foreign Trade, Investments and Fisheries; Ombudsman of Ecuador; Ministry of Women and Human Rights; Diverse Dialogue Foundation; Datalat Foundation; Citizenship and Development Foundation; Internet Help Foundation; Esquel Foundation; Hemispheres University.

[2] Claudia Vega, Citizenship and Development Foundation, interview with IRM, March 3rd 2023.

[3] Alicia Salgado, Counterpart International, interview with IRM, March 3rd 2023.

[4] Claudia Vega, Citizenship and Development Foundation, interview with IRM, March 3rd 2023.

[5] Ecuador, 2019-2022 Results Report. Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): https://www.opengovpartnership.org/documents/ecuador-results-report-2019-2022-for-public-comment

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open Government Partnership