Skip Navigation

Extractive Industries Transparency and Accountability

The extractive industries include oil, gas, and mining. These high-value industries are often prone to significant corruption, environmental damage, and security challenges. Consequently, many countries that depend primarily on these resources for international trade face major economic and governance challenges.

Governments can take numerous open government approaches to mitigate the worst effects of extraction. These include improving legal and regulatory standards and strengthening accountability for governments as well as private and state-owned companies along the supply chain. Reforms should also support public understanding of natural resource management as well as public dialogue and oversight to ensure that the proceeds and benefits from natural resources go back to the public, including affected communities, while mitigating the harms of extractive activities.

Open Gov Challenge: Anti-Corruption

With OGP’s 2023-2028 Strategy, OGP members are set to work toward a number of aspirational thematic reforms through the Open Gov Challenge. This section of the Open Gov Guide addresses Anti-Corruption,

Challenge prompt: Develop, strengthen, and/or implement a whole-of-government anti-corruption legislation, strategy or roadmap.

Actions and reforms that fit within the scope of this challenge should include at least one of the following areas:

  • Beneficial ownership
  • Open contracting
  • Political finance and asset and interest disclosure
  • Lobbying
  • Integrity systems at local level
  • Extractive industry transparency

Through this challenge, governments can improve policy, implementation and interoperability (including through OGP) across the areas above.


Key Terms

Definitions for key terms such as the different stages of extractive activities, minerals, and state-owned enterprise.

  • Upstream activities: This refers to when governments or companies undertake exploratory activities to identify and obtain ownership of sources of gas, minerals, and oil. This can include the creation of geological surveys, purchasing land rights, and exploratory drilling.
  • Midstream activities: In the mining sector, midstream activities refer to the process of converting mineral concentrates into higher-purity products that can be used for further conversion. In the oil and gas sector, midstream activities involve the transportation (by pipeline, rail, barge, oil tanker, or truck), storage, and wholesale marketing of crude or refined products.
  • Downstream activities: Downstream activities in the oil, gas, and mining industries occur after the collection or production of raw materials. This is the final stage of the production chain, where crude oil, natural gas, and minerals are refined and/or processed into usable products for consumers.
  • Minerals: Minerals include naturally occurring inorganic substances like cobalt, copper, diamonds, gold, iron ore, lithium, petroleum, silver, uranium, and zinc. There is increasing concern about “critical minerals,” which play an essential role in producing, transmitting, storing, and conserving energy. Critical minerals are at a high risk of supply chain disruption, especially if the demand for such materials increases sharply.
  • State-owned enterprise: A state-owned enterprise (SOE) is a business entity owned (wholly or partially) by the government. SOEs in the extractive industries often have significant control over valuable resources and large financial flows, and experience heightened corruption risks due to their ownership structure.
  • Joint venture: Joint ventures refer to a business arrangement where two or more parties agree to pool their resources for a specific task or project. In the context of extractive industries, a group of companies, which can include state-owned enterprises, create a business entity to conduct explorations or exploit natural resources like minerals or hydrocarbons in a specified area under the terms of an agreed contract.

The Evidence

The evidence is clear: open government approaches can lead to better natural resource governance practices, which in turn can improve human development and environmental outcomes. Without transparency, civic participation, and public accountability, countries rich in natural resources (or “producer countries”) are at a high risk of experiencing increased corruption, social and environmental harms, and sometimes conflict.

  • Countries that derive much of their revenue from natural resources are more prone to authoritarianism. Specifically, when countries collect large revenues from natural resources, they are less dependent on levying taxes on citizens. This means that politicians and government officials are not incentivized to respond to citizen needs or demands. At the same time, citizens may feel less invested in the national budget when its funding source is unclear. This is particularly true in producer countries that do not provide public information on extractive industry payments.
  • Without democratic oversight, the richness of natural resources can encourage risky economic practices, rent-seeking, corruption, and even state capture, often resulting in an under-investment in social services and development. Without transparent and accountable public financial management practices, producer countries may borrow unsustainably, are subject to external price shocks, and can experience large influxes of foreign currencies, which make other sectors less competitive. These countries may also be more likely to invest less in agriculture and manufacturing and regularly have declining terms of trade.
  • Extractive industries can negatively affect public well-being and equality, particularly gender equality, without good governance and democratic oversight. Locally, regions that depend more on extraction have higher rates of illegal drug use and sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDs, due to increased migration to the resource-rich area. At a macro level, evidence suggests that women’s inequality can increase in countries with more resources when not governed well—as a study of Saudi Arabia shows, oil wealth negatively correlates with women’s participation in the labor force. On the other hand, resource-rich countries such as Chile, Norway, and the Netherlands have avoided the gender inequality trap, as there are strict controls and oversight on how their extractive industries run. Some evidence suggests that increasing women’s political participation limits corruption and increases a more equitable sharing of benefits in these situations.
  • Extractive industries are also associated with negative environmental impacts, especially without strong oversight. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard requires the public disclosure of environmental risks and harm. Environmental impact monitoring can inform steps to mitigate the negative impacts of extraction.

Reform Guidance

The recommendations below represent reforms that national and local governments, representatives of civil society organizations, and others can consider for their action plans and the Open Gov Challenge. The reforms are categorized according to OGP’s principal values: transparency, civic participation, and public accountability. Reforms should be adapted to fit the domestic context, and involve and coordinate with other levels and branches of government.

Reforms across policy areas are also tagged by the estimated degree of difficulty in implementation. Though progress is often not linear, the recommendations have been categorized using these labels to give the reader a sense of how different reforms can work together to raise the ambition of open government approaches.

Recommended Reforms Key

  • Transparency: Transparency empowers citizens to exercise their rights, hold the government accountable, and participate in decision-making processes. Examples of relevant activities include the proactive or reactive publication of government-held information, legal or institutional frameworks to strengthen the right to access information, and disclosing information using open data standards.

  • Civic Participation: When people are engaged, governments and public institutions are more responsive, innovative, and effective. Examples of relevant initiatives include new or improved processes and mechanisms for the public to contribute to decisions, participatory mechanisms to involve underrepresented groups in policy making, and a legal environment that guarantees civil and political rights.

  • Public Accountability: Public accountability occurs when public institutions must justify their actions, act upon requirements and criticisms, and take responsibility for failure to perform according to laws or commitments. Importantly, public accountability means that members of the public can also access and trigger accountability mechanisms. Examples of relevant activities include citizen audits of performance, new or improved mechanisms or institutions that respond to citizen-initiated appeals processes, and improved access to justice.

  • Inclusion: Inclusion is fundamental to achieving more equitable, representative, and accountable policies that truly serve all people. This includes increasing the voice, agency, and influence of historically discriminated or underrepresented groups. Depending on the context, traditionally underrepresented groups may experience discrimination based on gender, sexual identity, race, ethnicity, age, geography, differing ability, legal, or socioeconomic status.

  • Foundational: This tag is used for reforms that are the essential building blocks of a policy area. “Foundational” does not mean low ambition or low impact. These recommendations often establish basic legal frameworks and institutional structures.

  • Intermediate: This tag is used for reforms that are complex and often involve coordination and outreach between branches, institutions, and levels of government, with the public or between countries.

  • Advanced: This tag is used for reforms that close important loopholes to make existing work more effective and impactful. Specifically, “Advanced” reforms are particularly ambitious, innovative or close important loopholes to make existing work more effective, impactful or sustainable. They are often applied in mature environments where they seek to institutionalize a good practice that has already shown results.

  • Executive: The executive branch of government is responsible for designing, implementing, and enforcing laws, policies, and initiatives. It is typically led by the head of state or government, such as a president or prime minister, along with their appointed cabinet members. The executive branch’s functions also include overseeing the day-to-day operations of the government, managing foreign affairs, and directing the country’s armed forces. In democratic systems, the executive branch is accountable to the legislature and the electorate, with its powers and limitations outlined in the constitution or legal framework of the respective country.

  • Legislative: The legislative branch of government is responsible for making laws and regulations and overseeing the functioning of the government. It typically consists of a body of elected representatives, such as a parliament, congress, or assembly, which is tasked with proposing, debating, amending, and ultimately passing legislation. The legislative branch plays a crucial role in representing the interests of the people, as its members are elected to office by the public. In addition to law-making, this branch often holds the power to levy taxes, allocate funds, and conduct certain investigations into matters of public concern. The structure and powers of the legislative branch are usually outlined in a country’s constitution or legal framework, and it serves as a check on the executive and judicial branches to ensure a system of checks and balances within a state.

Examples of Reforms from OGP and Beyond

The following examples are commitments previously made within or beyond OGP that demonstrate elements of the recommendations made above. OGP members have consistently made commitments to advance transparency and accountability in the extractive industries since 2011, with these reforms evaluated by the IRM as being more ambitious than the average of commitments made to date. The IRM also found that commitments in this policy area tend to have stronger early results than the average OGP commitment.

OGP Reforms
  • ARMENIA Public Beneficial Ownership Register: Published the company beneficial owners of all sectors in a public register after piloting for the mining industry. The register streamlines data entry and automatically verifies and cross-checks submissions in line with Open Ownership’s Beneficial Ownership Data Standard (BODS). Also committed to making company beneficial ownership data interoperable with public procurement data.
  • ECUADOR FiTI Standard Implementation: Implemented the Fisheries Transparency Initiative (FiTI) Standard, which includes adherence to annual reporting requirements on information disclosure and public involvement in governing the fisheries sector. As part of the commitment, Ecuador created a platform with centralized information and a dashboard of results.
  • GHANA Disclosure of Petroleum Contracts and Power Purchase Agreements: Published most of its PPAs to renegotiate its overproducing, underdelivering electricity sector and committed to amending the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission Act to promote transparency. The country launched a petroleum register in 2018 that publishes data on oil and gas contracts, amendments, authorizations, and permits, as well as a PPA register in 2023 that publishes information on all active electricity contracts.
  • INDONESIA Public Beneficial Ownership Register: Created a public beneficial ownership registry for all sectors, the first of its kind in Southeast Asia, after piloting data collection for extractive industries. Also committed to improving the verification of beneficial ownership data as well as centralizing and standardizing reporting across government agencies.
  • MALAWI Regulatory Framework for Natural Resource Governance: Committed to creating a regulatory framework on the disclosure of beneficial owners and contracts for extractive industries. The commitment would require the oversight of contracts by the parliamentary committee on natural resources and the creation of a sovereign wealth fund to manage revenue.
  • MONGOLIA Law to Increase Transparency in Extractive Industries: Committed to passing a law to create a centralized, public database for information on the extractive industries, which will be submitted by the national, state, and local governments, as well as private companies and those of a mixed legal status (such as partly state-owned enterprises).
  • NIGERIA Public Beneficial Ownership Register: Published company beneficial ownership data in a free, public register according to Open Ownership’s BODS. The portal is searchable by entity name, entity number, or an individual’s name, and users can view the historical information of a company’s beneficial owners.
  • PHILIPPINES EITI Implementation at the Local Level: Committed to continuing to increase local government capacity and consult diverse groups of stakeholders to implement the EITI Standard. One initiative is to build a central, public platform where local governments can report data on extractive industries and to train industry and civil society representatives on how to use the data.
  • SEYCHELLES Public Participation in Fisheries Governance under FiTI: Committed to strengthening public participation in fisheries governance in the country to monitor decision-making and policy implementation for this sector as part of its implementation of the FiTI Standard.
Beyond OGP Action Plans
  • ARGENTINA Critical Minerals Data Transparency: Published reports on the taxes, royalties, and other payments related to its critical minerals industry and launched an open mining data platform that includes a specific dashboard related to lithium. Argentina also created an online registry of critical minerals suppliers in 2023, listing 1,500 suppliers from 22 provinces.
  • ZAMBIA Public Beneficial Ownership Register: One of the first to join Opening Extractives, a joint initiative by EITI and Open Ownership, the government is working to create a public, economy-wide beneficial ownership register that can be integrated with other key datasets, such as the mining cadastre.

The Role of Local Governments

Local governments help ensure that natural resources benefit their public in a number of ways, which require both transparency and public oversight.

  • Attracting investment and business development, including through tax expenditures, favorable policy, or grants of land.
  • Taking part in permitting and impact assessment processes, including follow-up to ensure that agreements are being followed.
  • Implementing revenue-sharing agreements and community benefits agreements that allocate a portion of profits to local development projects.
  • Facilitating use of private sector or project-specific grievance mechanisms.

Who is working on this topic?

A
Albania Albania
Argentina Argentina
Armenia Armenia
Australia Australia
B
Bulgaria Bulgaria
Burkina Faso Burkina Faso
C
Cabo Verde
Canada Canada
Chile Chile
Colombia Colombia
Costa Rica Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire Côte D'ivoire
D
Denmark Denmark
E
Ecuador Ecuador
F
France France
G
Georgia Georgia
Germany Germany
Ghana Ghana
Greece Greece
Guatemala Guatemala
H
Honduras Honduras
I
Indonesia Indonesia
J
Jordan Jordan
K
Kenya Kenya
Kyrgyz Republic Kyrgyz Republic
L
Liberia Liberia
M
Madrid, Spain
Malawi Malawi
Mexico Mexico
Mongolia Mongolia
N
Netherlands Netherlands
Nigeria Nigeria
North Macedonia North Macedonia
Norway
P
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay Paraguay
Peru Peru
Philippines Philippines
Plateau, Nigeria
R
Romania Romania
S
Senegal Senegal
Seychelles
Shama, Ghana
Sierra Leone Sierra Leone
South Africa South Africa
South Cotabato, Philippines
Spain Spain
Sri Lanka Sri Lanka
T
Tarkwa Nsuaem, Ghana
Tunisia Tunisia
U
Ukraine Ukraine
United Kingdom United Kingdom
United States United States
Uruguay Uruguay
W
Wassa Amenfi East, Ghana

This list reflects members with commitments in the “Extractive Industries” policy area of the Data Dashboard.


Active OGP Partners

The following organizations have recently worked on this issue in the context of OGP at the national or international level. They may have additional insights on the topic. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. If you are interested in national-level initiatives, please contact research@opengovpartnership.org.


Benchmarking Data

The OGP 2023-2028 Strategy sets out the Open Gov Challenge and aims to provide clear benchmarks for performance through reliable data.

While benchmarks for individual countries and Open Gov Guide recommendations are not yet integrated, for this chapter, interested individuals may rely on the following data sets:

  • The Natural Resource Governance Index maintained by the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI) remains one of the global benchmarks in measurement of natural resource openness. However, the index has not been updated since 2021.
  • EITI has two relevant databases—the SOE database and a database on its implementing members, which includes government and company revenue, disaggregated by revenue stream.
  • The Energy Transparency Index, supported by the European Union, OGP, and other partners, provides data on transparency in the energy sectors of Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia.
  • OGP commitments on this topic can be found on the Data Dashboard.

Guidance & Standards

While the list below is not exhaustive, it aims to provide a range of recommendations, standards, and analysis to guide reform in this policy area.

  • The OGP Support Unit and EITI published a report called Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI, which is a 2019 review of how both organizations mutually reinforce each other’s work. The OGP Support Unit also published guidance on how to implement financial regulation to reduce corruption in market economies. For example, it shows that where extractive companies are incorporated or listed in public stock exchanges, governments can adopt legislation requiring disclosure of payments from those companies.
  • The United Nations (UN) published the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which sets standards relevant to the operations of extractive industries, particularly with regard to respecting the rights of communities that may be harmed by business activities. In September 2024, the UN also published a new set of guiding principles on critical minerals for the energy transition.
  • The OECD published the Multinational Standards on Responsible Business, which includes details related to supply chain transparency. Supply chain transparency, as described above in this chapter and in the “Energy Transition” chapter of the Open Gov Guide, is an especially pressing issue for the extractive industries. The OECD has also published guidance to link the mining of conflict minerals with the EITI Standard.
  • In 2000, a multi-stakeholder group of governments, international civil society organizations, and extractive companies created the Voluntary Principles for Security and Human Rights. The principles aim to help companies create a human rights assessment of their operations.
  • The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has a set of standards that aim to support any organization in publishing credible reports on their economic, environmental, and social impacts. GRI has two standards that relate specifically to extractive industries—GRI 11 in the oil and gas sector and GRI 14 in the mining sector.
  • EITI has extensive guidance on how to meet its standard, as well as a recent call to actionexploring how EITI’s transparency approach can also be applied to renewable energy.
  • Open Ownership and EITI partnered to create the “Opening Extractives” program, which aims to increase the availability and use of beneficial ownership data in the extractive industries. As part of the program, Open Ownership produced guidance and resources related to this topic.
  • The Open Contracting Partnership has published an analysis with the Natural Resources Governance Institute on the best contracting practices for oil, gas, and mineral rights as part of its broader work advocating for open contracting in the extractive industries.
  • The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA)has a Standard for Responsible Mining that defines best practices for responsible mining at the industrial scale. It also provides the list of expectations that independent auditors will use as the benchmark for responsible mines.
  • The International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) created a set of mining principles to define a shared set of good practices for extractive companies to advance sustainability in this sector. ICMM is also developing a new Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative, which would bring together Copper Mark, the Mining Association of Canada, and World Gold Council standards in a single place.
Open Government Partnership