Skip Navigation

Australia

  • Member Since 2015
  • Action Plan 3

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 3

  • Number of Commitments: 8
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Australia’s third action plan includes promising commitments to introduce new legislation on automated decision-making by government, political donation transparency, and whistleblower protection. The action plan renewed Australia’s engagement in OGP following a period of inactivity and re-engaged the Open Government Forum. However, a short co-creation timeline meant inadequate public engagement, especially with non-traditional and marginalised communities. (More)


Contact

Lucinda Atkinson Assistant Secretary, Fraud Prevention and Anti-Corruption Branch, Attorney-General's Department OpenGovernment@ag.gov.au

Commitments


Resources

  1. Australia – Process Update Letter (September 2024)

    2024, Letter, Web page

  2. Australia Action Plan Review 2023–2025

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Australia Action Plan Review 2024-2025 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Australia Action Plan 2023-2025 (December)

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Australia – Under Review Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  6. Australia – Letters Regarding New Action Plan (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  7. Australia Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Australia – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Web page

  9. Australia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Australia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  11. Australia Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Australia Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  13. Australia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Australia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  15. Australia End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  16. Australia Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  17. Australia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  18. Australia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  19. Australia Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. Australia Response Policy Report – August 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  21. OGP Letter to Australia Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  22. Australia National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  23. Australia – Steven Kennedy – November 2016

    2016, Letter, Web page

  24. Australia Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2015, Letter, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
0
0
Action Plan 2
0
Action Plan 3

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 3

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Faces of Open Government – Peter Timmins

How did you get involved in open government - what is your personal story about why you joined the movement? I became aware of the Open Government Partnership the day after the inaugural meeting in New York on 20 September…

Show More
Open Government Partnership