Skip Navigation

Madrid, Spain

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

Show links

Madrid joined OGP as part of the 2016 cohort. They are currently implementing five commitments from their 2024-2027 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to citizen participation and inclusion.

Contacts

Angela Perez Brunete Director General of Transparency, Madrid City Council dgtransparenciayc@madrid.es
Gobierno Abierto Ayuntamiento de Madrid

www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/El-Ayuntamiento/Gobierno-abierto/

Commitments

Resources

  1. Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2024 – 2027

    2024, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Ejercicio Final de Aprendizaje II- Plan de Acción 2022-2023 – Madrid

    2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page

  3. Final Learning Exercise II- Action Plan 2022-2023 – Madrid

    2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page

  4. Final Learning Exercise- Action Plan 2022-2023 – Madrid

    2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page

  5. End of Commitment Report – Improvement of the transparency portal and increase of open data visualisations

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  6. End of Commitment Report – Broaden the spectrum of participation

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  7. End of Commitment Report – Improvement of the decide Madrid platform

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  8. End of Commitment Report – Community Actions for a Healthy City Strategy

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  9. Final Monitoring Report – Action plan – Madrid, Spain – May 2023

    2023, Self Assessment, Web page

  10. Informe final de seguimiento – Plan de Acción – Madrid, Spain – May 2023 (Spanish)

    2023, Self Assessment, Web page

  11. Informe de seguimiento – Plan de Acción – Madrid, Spain – Dec 2022 (Spanish)

    2023, Self Assessment, Web page

  12. Inception Report – Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2022 – 2023

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  13. IRM Report on Local Action Plans

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2022 – 2023

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  15. Madrid, Spain Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Madrid Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  17. Madrid IRM Report 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web Page

  18. Madrid IRM Report 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  19. Madrid Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Madrid Final IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  21. Madrid Preliminary IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  22. Madrid, Spain Action Plan 2017

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  23. Access Info Europe Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  24. Transparency International España Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  25. Civio Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
0
1
Action Plan 2
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Contracting
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Freedom of Association
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Defending Journalists and Activists
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Regulatory Governance
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Access to Information

Right to Information
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Health)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Education)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Participation
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Oversight
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Recent Posts

Madrid, Spain · Spain

Featured Commitment – Madrid

Subnational Pilot: Madrid, Spain Action Plan: 2017 Commitment: Development of participatory budgeting In April, the Financial Times reported that Spain’s ongoing ruling-party corruption scandal had “claimed a new political scalp,” with a Popular Party veteran resigning in the wake of…

Open Government Partnership