Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting
The 2022 OGP Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting is taking place on November 1-3 in Marrakech, Morocco.
2020-2022
Action Plan 4
Government agencies’ limited funding and commitment resulted in a low level of implementation and few early open government results from Liberia’s fourth action plan. However, modest progress was made toward establishing systems to disclose public contract and beneficial ownership information. Coordination among government, civil society, and international partners was a key ingredient for these reforms. (More)
The 2022 OGP Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting is taking place on November 1-3 in Marrakech, Morocco.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Citizens fight to better understand their land rights and protect their community land.
2024, Letter, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, Letter, Web page
2019, Perspective, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Since signing up to OGP in 2011, Liberia has reiterated its commitments to transparency and accountability on issues ranging from beneficial ownership to budget transparency to openness in healthcare delivery.
Desde que se incorporó a OGP en 2011, Liberia ha reiterado su compromiso con temas relacionados con la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas, desde transparencia en beneficiarios reales hasta la apertura en la provisión de servicios de salud. Pero…
Read how open gov reformers are maximizing the transparency and accountability of the police.
Read how reformers in Liberia are working together to ensure the autonomy and preservation of their land rights.
In Liberia, citizens often lack a clear understanding of how their justice system works. In an effort to build trust in the judiciary, the Chief Justice's Office of Liberia will improve government capacity...
" Back to Briefing Paper: Implementing SDG16+ Plan de acción 2017 – 2019, compromiso #4 En Liberia, la ciudadanía en general desconoce cómo funciona el sistema de justicia. En un esfuerzo por generar confianza en el poder judicial, la oficina…
Access to justice and legal empowerment are increasingly viewed as essential elements of open government. They’re vital components for participation and inclusion. The Tbilisi Global Summit included enthusiasm for justice and open government not present in previous meetings; multiple sessions…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close