Skip Navigation

Romania

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 6

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 6

  • Number of Commitments: 10
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Romania’s sixth action plan contains three promising commitments, including, for the first time, access to justice for victims of gender-based violence. The two other promising commitments continue ongoing OGP reforms, while the action plan also addresses new areas including extractives sector transparency and participatory budgeting. Implementation could benefit from targeted civil society engagement, as well as collaboration between commitments, such as for publishing high-value data sets.

Romania’s sixth action plan consists of ten commitments, half of which build upon commitments from previous plans. It covers areas in which Romania has shown a longtime interest, such as de-bureaucratization, transparency of national investment funds, and open data. New areas include participatory budgeting, environmental protection, access to justice for victims of gender-based violence, gender equality in decision-making, and joining the Extractives Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Many commitments align with national policy strategies, European Union (EU) programs, and international funding, which will help implementing agencies to carry them out. The sixth action plan is similar in its level of ambition to the fifth plan, with most commitments constituting positive but modest steps forward. (More)

OpenStories for OGP site

OpenStories

Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.

Contact

Point of Contact

Larisa Panait Advisor, Secretariat-General of the Government ogp@gov.ro

Commitments

Resources

  1. Romania Results Report 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  2. Romania Results Report 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Romania Action Plan Review 2022-2024

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Romania Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Inception Report – Action plan – Timișoara, Romania, 2022 – 2024

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  6. Romania Action Plan 2022-2024 (June)

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Action plan – Timișoara, Romania, 2022 – 2024

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  8. Romania Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Romania Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Romania Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Romania Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Romania Action Plan 2020-2022

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Romania End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  14. Romania Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Romania Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  16. Romania Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Romania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  18. Iași, Romania Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Romania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  20. Iasi, Romania – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  21. Romania Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  22. Romania Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  23. Iași, Romania – Letter of Intent to Join OGP (March 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  24. Romania Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  25. Romania Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  26. Romania End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Romania End of Term Self Assessment Report 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  28. Romania Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  29. Romania Progress Report 2014-2015 – Public Comment Version

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  30. Romania 2014-2015 IRM Progress Report for Public Comment

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  31. Romania’s First IRM Report: Public Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  32. Romania Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  33. Romania IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  34. Romania Self Assessment Report 2012

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  35. Romania, Second Action Plan, 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  36. Romania, Midterm Self-Assessment Report, 2014-2016

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  37. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
3
0
1
Action Plan 3
2
0
1
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.84 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.39 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.15 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.88 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.55 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.19 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.53 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.00 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.52 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.28 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.72 Sources

Revent Posts

high school boy and girl at computer
Slovak Republic · Romania · Greece · Chile

How Open Educational Resources can Help OGP Initiatives

Currently we face both a swell of support for open educational resources (OER) and devastating upheaval of our traditional education systems...

Romania

Romania’s new NAP: the civil society perspective

Romania is very close to adopting its third National Action Plan, 2016-2018. The consultation process started in March. At the end of June, the Government published the final draft of the NAP, to be approved in the coming weeks. Both…

Show More
Open Government Partnership