IRM Report

Montenegro’s second action plan ended a prolonged period of OGP inactivity in the country. The plan addresses budget transparency, public participation, and electronic services. Most commitments derive from the country’s ongoing Public Administration Reform and the EU accession process. Moving…

Denmark’s third action plan focused on increasing open data, improving transparency in the public sector, and promoting open government globally. Notably, the action plan resulted in the creation of a new portal with data on day-care facilities (Commitment 3) as…

The Netherlands third action plan includes a diverse set of commitments, with a particular focus on local governance. Civil society provided significant input during the co-creation process through the multi-stakeholder forum, as well as via direct consultations with relevant central…

Romania’s fourth action plan covers a wide range of topics, including some areas where the country has seen a decline in recent years. Notable commitments include standardizing public consultations, improving transparency of national investment funds, and simplifying monitoring of the…

The co-creation process of Paraguay’s fourth action plan was highly collaborative, resulting in a plan that engages all three branches of government and covers the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. However, due to an overlap with national elections, the process faced…

La Libertad’s 2018-2020 action plan presents an opportunity to improve citizen participation in the region via the platform “Decide La Libertad”. Citizens provided inputs during the co-creation process of the action plan, but the government did not publish a reasoned…

El Salvador’s fourth action plan is aligned with the country’s national priorities, including fiscal transparency, accountability, and human rights. The co-creation process included a broad, open consultation and the Government responded to the input presented by civil society organizations and…

The majority of the commitments in Peru’s third action plan are verifiable and of moderate potential impact. However, its co-creation process did not include a feedback mechanism for the public justifying the acceptance or rejection of civil society contributions. In…

Georgia’s fourth action plan includes initiatives undertaken by the central government, the Parliament, and several local municipalities. Despite the range of topics covered, many commitments aim for minor improvements and do not clearly align with stakeholder priorities identified during the…

El proceso de cocreación del tercer plan de acción en Argentina ha sido el más inclusivo y participativo registrado hasta la fecha. El plan de acción resultante abarcó tanto a los tres poderes del Estado nacional como al plano subnacional…