Skip Navigation

Bosnia and Herzegovina Design Report 2019-2021

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s complex institutional set up and political system has affected its engagement in OGP since 2014. This first action plan was developed with civil society input and published in 2019. Commitments are related to ongoing projects rather than new initiatives, and include access to open data, public procurement transparency, public consultations and integrity plans in public institutions. Feedback on commitment proposals and greater collaboration between civil society and government in drafting commitments could improve the ambition of the action plan.

Table 1. At a glance

Participating since:                   2014
Action plan under review:        First
Report type:                           Design Report
Number of commitments:        7

Action plan development
Is there a multistakeholder forum:         Yes
Level of public influence:                    Involve
Acted contrary to OGP process:           No

Action plan design
Commitments relevant to OGP values:      6 (85%)
Transformative commitments:            0 (0%)
Potentially starred commitments:         0

Commitments
BA0001 Open Data on Public Procurement in Bih
BA0002 Online Drafting of Integrity Plans
BA0003 Civil Servant Training Modules
BA0004 Open Official Statistics
BA0005 CSO Participation in Policymaking
BA0006 Institutional Transparency
BA0007 Citizens Budget Draft

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a global partnership that brings together government reformers and civil society leaders to create action plans that make governments more inclusive, responsive, and accountable. The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) monitors all action plans to ensure governments follow through on commitments. Bosnia and Herzegovina joined OGP in 2014. Since, Bosnia and Herzegovina has not implemented any action plans. This report evaluates the design of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s first action plan.

General overview of action plan

The country’s complex, decentralized and asymmetrical political system and politically entrenched divisions on ethnic lines in a post-conflict situation make it difficult to find agreement amongst the different institutions, and has affected the co-creation process and ambition of the action plan. The plan includes many commitments that are relevant to OGP values. In the cases of some commitments, milestones are already in progress; while others build on wider government initiatives or plans, providing continuity – such as opening up datasets, streamlining integrity plans, and improving participation mechanisms with civil society.

The action plan development process stalled as the multistakeholder forum, created in 2016, was unable to properly function and take decisions. There were opportunities for civil society engagement at the start of the process and there was a short public consultation on the draft action plan. Most commitments in the final action plan are related to ongoing projects and larger initiatives of state-level institutions.

The action plan contains seven commitments. Particularly noteworthy commitments with moderate potential impact address public procurement transparency and involving civil society in improving participation in policy-making processes. Other commitments with minor potential impact address issues of open data, proactive transparency of BiH institutions, and for the first time, producing a budget for citizens. One commitment on streamlining the process of developing integrity plans is not relevant to OGP values.

Table 2. Noteworthy commitments

Commitment description Moving forward Status at the end of implementation cycle
Commitment 1.

Open Data on Public Procurement in BiH – Make publicly available all public procurement data in BiH which are collected through the public procurement portal.

Ensure that the data in the public procurement system is of high quality as well as open data. Consider how the information could be systematically used to detect, investigate and prosecute against fraud and the misuse of public funds. Note: this will be assessed at the end of the action plan cycle.
Commitment 5.

Involvement of civil society organizations in policy-making processes – Hold workshops to introduce the online consultation system and get recommendations on improving consultation processes. 

Ensure outreach with wider civil society in the country. Ensure that recommendations on how to improve the consultation process are implemented and feedback is given to civil society about why certain recommendations might or might not be implemented. Note: this will be assessed at the end of the action plan cycle.
Commitment 7.

Drafting of the Budget for Citizens – Prepare, in collaboration with civil society, and publish a Budget for Citizens.

Implement a public awareness campaign on the finalized Budget for Citizens to reach a broad cross section of the public. Run workshops and consultations with citizens early on in the process of developing a budget to identify their priorities for public spending, which could influence public spending itself, or what parts of the budget for citizens to focus on, and provide feedback on this input. Note: this will be assessed at the end of the action plan cycle.

Recommendations

IRM recommendations aim to inform the development of the next action plan and guide implementation of the current action plan. Please refer to Section V: General Recommendations for more details on each of the below recommendations.

Table 3. Five KEY IRM Recommendations

Create a comprehensive OGP repository website
Seek and publish feedback about consultation contributions and publish the reasoning behind the selection of commitments
Work with civil society to develop a state-level Open Data Strategy
Amend the Law on Free Access to Information to bring it into line with European transparency standards
Strengthen the public procurement monitoring system in BiH and ensure that cases of corruption are investigated and sanctioned.

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open Government Partnership