Skip Navigation

Parliamentary Transparency: Does it Improve Behavior, Trust, and Policy?

SG hero – Parliamentary Transparency input paper

For more than twenty years, development practitioners, scholars, and international donors have been promoting transparency and accountability as the cornerstones of democracy. Recognizing the democratic values of improved trust, better policy, reduced corruption, and enhanced public participation, international and domestic actors have promoted applying transparency tools, such as access to information, open meetings, and disclosures, within legislative bodies to advance these principles.

Through the wave of accountability discourse, citizen’s expectations for transparency have become the norm. Citizens want greater transparency and accountability, but the tools being applied are not sufficient; there is a need for additional actors, such as civil society organizations dedicated to monitoring parliaments or media, and additional emphasis on the identification and disclosure of information that is meaningful for people to truly hold their parliamentarians
accountable. Notably, while transparency alone is not enough to reach the democratic ideals of trust, participation, and better policy, in some cases, it might have negative impacts, such as opening the door to undue influence of special interests or lobbyists.

The goal of this state-of-the-evidence review by Laura Neuman is to distinguish and highlight research on topics relevant to legislative transparency and to foster its use by Open Government Partnership (OGP) stakeholders, including parliamentarians/legislators, civil society organizations, and media development donors. The defining question for the review is, “What are the benefits of legislative transparency?” To reach that point, one must begin by exploring which—if any—of the various legislative transparency mechanisms being applied are the most effective in achieving the benefits.

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open Government Partnership