Skip Navigation

Spain Implementation Report 2017-2019

The implementation of Spain’s third action plan strengthened the governance of the OGP process through the creation of the Open Government Forum. This forum fostered a space for dialogue and civil society participation. The high degree of completion achieved during this cycle allowed for significant progress in opening up the Government, especially in access to information and citizen participation.

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a global partnership that brings together government reformers and civil society leaders to create action plans that make Governments more inclusive, responsive, and accountable. The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) monitors all action plans to ensure Governments follow through on commitments. Spain joined OGP in 2011. Since then, the country has implemented three action plans. This report evaluates the implementation of Spain’s third action plan.

Table 1. At a Glance

Member since: 2011

Action plan under review: 2017-2019

Type of report: Implementation

Number of commitments: 20

Action Plan Development

Is there a multistakeholder forum? Yes

Level of public influence: Involve

Acted contrary to the OGP process: No

Action Plan Design

Commitments relevant to OGP values: 16 (80%)

Transformative commitments: 1 (5%)

Potentially starred commitments: 1 (5%)

Action Plan Implementation

Starred commitments: 1 (5%)

Completed commitments: 11 (55%)

Commitments with significant DIOG*: 6 (30%)

Commitments with exceptional DIOG *2 (10%)

Level of public influence: Involve

Acted contrary to the OGP process: No

*DIOG: Did it Open Government

General Overview of the Action Plan

The Open Government Forum (commitment 1.1), contributed to civil society participation during the implementation of the action plan. The access to information tools established by the Government were a website, a repository, and regular meetings between the members of the forum at different levels – working groups, permanent commission and plenary session. These spaces fostered dialogue between civil society and the Government, allowing both the reception of proposals and feedback on how these proposals were addressed in the implementation process.

The high degree of compliance with the action plan allowed significant contributions to the opening of the Government. The Participatory Web Space on Open Government (commitment 2.2) strengthened the access to information by monitoring the implementation of the action plan.

Likewise, the State Transparency portal (commitment 3.1) now offers large amounts of statistical data on access to information, in different formats. Also, given the recommendations of the IRM in previous reports, the applicant identification system was simplified, facilitating the exercise of the right of access.

In terms of citizen participation, the Network of Local Entities in Transparency and Participation was created, contributing to the development of the open government agenda at a local level. In the Region of Murcia, the mechanisms for citizen participation in the decision-making process on regional budgets were strengthened.

Starred commitments must meet the following criteria:

  • In the Design Report, the commitment was rated as verifiable, relevant to OGP values, and with transformative potential impact.
  • The IRM implementation report rated commitment implementation as substantial or completed.

Based on these criteria, Spain’s action plan has one starred commitment:

  • Commitment 1.1: Creation of an Open Government Forum

Table 2. Noteworthy Commitments

Commitment Description Status at the end of the implementation cycle
Commitment 1.1:

Creation of an Open Government Forum

This commitment was completed. It fostered greater multi-stakeholder participation in the OGP process, improving inclusivity and representation of non-governmental and subnational entities
Commitment 1.3

Promotion of the Network of Local Entities in Transparency and Participation

The complete implementation of this commitment allowed the consolidation of the Network, improving participation channels for local entities and enabling them to promote greater transparency.
Commitment 3.1

Improvement of the Transparency portal and Right of Access

The General Secretariat of Digital Administration completed this commitment that contributes with access to information by improving the State Transparency portal (transparencia.gob.es), which now offers a greater number of statistics in reusable formats, thus facilitating the exercise of the right of access by simplifying the applicant identification system
Commitment 4.3

Improve the quality of real estate data through the coordination of the Cadastre and Land Registry

This commitment reached a substantial level of implementation that contributed, through inter-institutional coordination, to the quality of real estate information –and its access through several channels-, the simplification of procedures, and the reduction of costs and administrative obstacles.
Commitment 5.3

Education in Open Government

The complete implementation of this commitment resulted in the development and dissemination of educational resources on open government, which exceeded expectations in terms of involvement of educational centers through proposals and in the different activities carried out.

Five Key IRM Recommendations

The IRM key recommendations are prepared in the IRM Design Report. They aim to

inform the development of the next action plan and guide the implementation of the

current action plan. In the Spain Design Report (2017- 2019), the IRM

recommended the following:

1. Improve the work dynamics and the functioning of the forum, to increase the quality of participation and offer spaces that allow the public to influence the final formulation of commitments.
2. Propose a smaller number of commitments, with greater specificity, ambition and potential impact, specially focused on the priorities expressed by citizens such as the fight against corruption through strategies and approaches based on open data, the development of regulations for whistleblower protection, regulation of pressure groups and lobbyists.
3. Encourage civil society active participation and strengthen its internal coordination.
4. Develop a communication strategy that allows the public to identify the national OGP process and the available participation channels.
5. Involve high level politicians and other government entities in the OGP process to move towards an “Open State”.

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open Government Partnership