Skip Navigation

Albania

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 6

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 6

  • Number of Commitments: 24
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Albania’s sixth action plan has broadened the range of policy areas and public institutions engaged in the OGP process. The establishment of the Multi-Stakeholder Committee addresses a long-standing IRM recommendation to institutionalize cooperation between the public administration and civil society in the OGP process. As many commitments are awareness-raising activities, institutions could add value by collaborating with civil society and incorporating measurements of their results during implementation. (More)

Contact

Point of Contact

Julia Cela Coordinator at the Department of Policy and EU Integration, Good Governance Unit Prime Minister's Office Julia.Cela@kryeministria.al

Commitments

Resources

  1. Albania Action Plan Review 2023-2025

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Albania Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Albania Results Report 2020-2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Albania Results Report 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Albania – Procedural Review Resolution by C&S Subcommittee (April 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  6. Albania Action Plan 2023-2025

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Albania Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Albania – Contrary to Process Letter (January 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  9. Albania End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2020-2022

    2022, Self Assessment, Web page

  10. Albania Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Albania Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Albania Under Review Letter (September 2021)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  13. Action plan – Tirana, Albania, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  14. Albania Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Albania Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  16. Elbasan – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  17. Tirana – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  18. Albania – Letter – Acting Contrary to Process (Standards) – July 2020

    2021, Letter, Web page

  19. Albania Action Plan 2020-2022

    2020, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Albania End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  21. Albania Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Albania Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  23. Albania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  24. Albania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  25. Albania End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  26. Albania Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  27. Albania Progress Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  28. Albania Progress Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  29. Albania 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  30. Albania Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  31. Albania End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  32. Albania End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  33. Albania End of Term Self-Assessment Report 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  34. Albania Third Action Plan 2016 – 2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  35. Albania Mid-Term Report 2014-2016

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  36. Albania Progress Report 2014-2015 – For Public Comment

    2016, Report Comments, Web page

  37. Albania Midterm Self-Assessment Report

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  38. Albanian Action Plan 2012

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  39. Albania Second Action Plan for 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  40. Albania IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

Current Data

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
Action Plan 2
0
0
1
Action Plan 3
1
0
1
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

Data from OGP Global Report - 2018

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.44 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.84 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.83 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.19 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.55 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.00 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.70 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.08 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.24 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.68 Sources

Recent Posts

Open Government Partnership