2022-2024
Action Plan 5
Armenia’s fifth action plan features promising commitments around data management, public communications, participatory budgeting, transparency of gifts received by public officials, and public procurement. Implementation will benefit from measures to ensure sustainability of results and more intensive public engagement. (More)
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Learn about this multi-year collaboration that aims strengthen the support and resources available to country reformers in the region to deepen reforms and advance bold, new ideas in areas like strengthening public service delivery, opening civic space, promoting a fair justice system and fighting corruption.
Learn about OGP's ongoing call for grant proposals to support OGP expanding civil society engagement and building cross-sectoral partnerships.
Point of Contact
2024, IRM Report, Web page
2024, Web page
2023, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2023, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Resource, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
This blog post was originally posted on Open Ownership’s website. Read the original post here. The International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC), hosted by the Government of Lithuania in June 2024, gathered practitioners from around the globe to discuss and advance action…
Launched in 2019, the Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group (or the Leadership Group) set out to advance global policy toward open beneficial ownership (BO) data, and achieve concrete progress by 2023. This summary examines the group's achievements, lessons learned by Open Ownership and the Open Government Partnership from co-convening the group, and future directions to advance BO reform.
During Open Gov Week in 2023, 155 students in Armenia took part in a series of trainings aimed at shaping youth as the future leaders in decision-making processes. The trainings were organized by the Prime Minister's Office with the financial…
By creating a beneficial ownership register, which makes information on company owners more accessible and transparent to the public, Armenia makes serious advances in its efforts to eradicate political and corporate corruption.
Watch the recording of the first event in a series of conversations on the role of parliaments and representative democracy at large in the Eastern Partnership region.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close