Skip Navigation

Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

Show links

Buenos Aires joined OGP as part of the 2016 cohort. They are currently implementing three commitments from their 2021-2023 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to open data, access to information and inclusion.

Contacts

Leticia Montiel Secretaría Legal y Técnica del Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.
María Fernanda Araujo Gerente Operativa Gobierno Abierto y Transparencia mariafernandaaraujo@buenosaires.gob.ar
Morena Bao Directorio Legislativo mbao@directoriolegislativo.org

Commitments

Resources

  1. Inception Report – Action plan – Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2021 – 2023

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  2. End of Commitment Report – Forum for the articulation and coordination of access to public information and transparency of the three branches of the State

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  3. End of Commitment Report – Strengthen the reuse of open data and the community

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  4. IRM Report on Local Action Plans

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  5. 2022 OGP Youth Toolkit

    2022, Guidance Document, Web page

  6. Buenos Aires Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  7. Buenos Aires Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Action plan – Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Buenos Aires Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Buenos Aires Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  11. Implementing SDG16+ Through the Open Government Partnership

    2019, Perspective, Web page

  12. Buenos Aires Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Buenos Aires IRM Report 2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Buenos Aires IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  15. Buenos Aires Preliminary IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comments

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  16. Buenos Aires Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  17. Buenos Aires, Argentina Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  18. Poder Ciudadano Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  19. Fundación Conocimiento Abierto Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  20. Directorio Legislativo Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  21. ACIJ Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

Bogota, Colombia (OGP Local)

OGP Local

Through OGP Local, participants can learn how to use open government values such as transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and inclusion to better meet the needs of the citizens they serve.

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
5
0
2
Action Plan 2
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Contracting
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Freedom of Association
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Defending Journalists and Activists
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Regulatory Governance
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Access to Information

Right to Information
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Health)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Education)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Participation
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Oversight
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Recent Posts

Buenos Aires, Argentina · Argentina

Results, Challenges, and Next Steps for the City of Buenos Aires

Launch Event: A Space of Encounter On April 11, 2018, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) launched the first #OGPLocal program report assessing the performance of the City of Buenos Aires in OGP during 2017. Local government representatives and civil society…

Buenos Aires, Argentina · Argentina

Getting out of the comfort zone to co-create: Lessons from Buenos Aires

During last month’s Americas Regional Meeting, the civil society organizations that make up the open government board, both at the national level in Argentina and at the subnational level in Buenos Aires, showed their ability to challenge, inconvenience, and put…

Buenos Aires, Argentina · Argentina

OGP as a Framework for Change: The Experience of Buenos Aires

The launching of the Subnational Pioneer Pilot Program within OGP in early 2016 was a significant step forward in the global open government agenda. While born within countries, cities and local governments are especially well positioned to make open government…

Open Government Partnership