2018-2020
Action Plan 1
Kyrgyz is currently implementing 17 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to transparency, participatory lawmaking, participatory budgeting and auditing, freedom of information and civic space.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.
When eight governments and nine civil society leaders launched OGP in 2011, no one expected it to reach its current size and scope. Over the last ten years, however, OGP has grown in ways that have exceeded expectations.
2024, Letter, Web page
2024, Letter, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web Page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
On July 7, over 100 open government reformers across the Asia-Pacific region convened for the conversation “Open Response + Open Recovery: Inclusive Participation and Civic Space in Times of Crisis”. The discussion focused on how reformers in the region are working to maintain inclusive civic participation and protect and expand civic space during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is what we heard.
El 7 de julio, más de 100 reformadores de gobierno abierto de la región Asia-Pacífico se reunieron en el foro “Respuesta abierta + Recuperación abierta: Participación inclusiva y espacio cívico en tiempos de crisis”. La discusión se enfocó en el…
Open government reformers from the Asia-Pacific region discuss how to maintain inclusive civic participation and hold and expand civic space during the COVID-19 crisis. Watch the recording...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close