Foreign Aid and Foreign Investment (MK0074)
Overview
At-a-Glance
Action Plan: Macedonia, Second Action Plan, 2014-2016
Action Plan Cycle: 2014
Status:
Institutions
Lead Institution: Ministry of Finance, Secretariat for European Affairs
Support Institution(s): Agency for Foreign Investments
Policy Areas
Aid, Civic Space, Freedom of AssociationIRM Review
IRM Report: Macedonia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016, Macedonia Progress Report 2014-2015
Early Results: Did Not Change
Design i
Verifiable: No
Relevant to OGP Values: Yes
Ambition (see definition): Low
Implementation i
Description
Foreign aid and foreign investment
IRM End of Term Status Summary
XIV. Transparency: Foreign Aid
Commitment 5.3: Foreign Aid and Foreign Investment
Commitment Text: 5.3. Foreign aid and foreign investment: a. Publication of documents on foreign investment in the country; b. Publication of data on obtained and planned foreign assistance (bilateral aid and EU funds).
Responsible institution(s): Ministry of Finance; Secretariat for European Affairs (SEA)
Supporting institution(s): Agency for Foreign Investments
Start Date: 1/1/2014 End Date: 31/12/2016
Commitment aim
This commitment sought to increase transparency by proactively publishing data on foreign investments in Macedonia and foreign aid (bilateral and EU funds) received.
Status
Midterm: Not started
According to the midterm self-assessment report as well as information received from the Secretariat for European Affairs (SEA), no progress was made in improving the database on foreign donor assistance. The IRM researcher’s search of the Internet found that information was last released in October 2014, and that data from the Central Donor Assistance Database (CDAD) was not reusable.
For more information, please see the 2014-2016 IRM midterm report.
End of term: Not started
The government did not report progress on the commitment. Its self-assessment report noted the preparatory activities and meetings held between the Agency for Foreign Investments, the SEA, and civil society. Its conclusion was that information was not released because there was no consensus on the data asked to be made public. Civil society representatives submitted their list of preferred data, and filed for access to the documents. The documents released did not contain information on the level of state subsidies or tax incentives.[Note 122: Interview with Darko Antic, Association for Solidarity and Equality of Women.] Additionally, the government reported two barriers to releasing this data. First, not all public institutions register their foreign funds, so their data are incomplete. Second, some of the contracts cannot be released without the prior consent of the other party. Considering that there was no proactive disclosure made, the IRM researcher concluded that there was no progress.
Did it open government?
Access to information: Did not change
Public Accountability: Did not change
Before OGP, the Agency for Foreign Investments did not provide data on foreign investments in the country.[Note 123: http://www.investinmacedonia.com/.] However, the Secretariat for European Affairs had, for a decade, been maintaining a Central Donor Assistance Database.[Note 124: http://cdad.sep.gov.mk/. ] This commitment sought to improve the proactive release of information on foreign aid (donors’ assistance), and allow access to information on foreign investments. In particular, it intended to improve fiscal transparency by publishing information on state subsidies or tax incentives for foreign investments. However, the lack of implementation caused data not to be released and, so, the commitment did not enhance access to information or create opportunities for holding officials accountable.