2022-2024
Action Plan 5
El quinto Plan de Acción de Gobierno Abierto (PAGA) de Paraguay busca avanzar un Estado Abierto con la inclusión de compromisos de los tres poderes- Ejecutivo, Legislativo y Judicial- . Aunque abarca diversos temas prioritarios para la sociedad civil, los compromisos en su mayoría son de alcance modesto o incierto. El proceso de cocreación se benefició de la institucionalización del foro multiactor compuesto por la Mesa Conjunta y el Comité Ejecutivo con su propio reglamento. Durante la implementación, el desafío será lograr una mayor participación de la sociedad civil y otros actores, que contribuya además a una mayor demanda social y uso de los servicios públicos potenciados a través de los compromisos. (More)
Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.
2024, Letter, Web page
2024, Letter, Web page
2024, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Self Assessment, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Research Product, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Research Product, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Case Study, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Letter, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Washington, D.C. - As CEO of the Open Government Partnership (OGP), I am deeply concerned about the apprehensions raised by civil society organizations in Paraguay about the potential impact of the “Establishing Control, Transparency, and Accountability of Non-Profit Organizations Act”…
Washington, DC – Como director ejecutivo de la Open Government Partnership (OGP), me preocupan profundamente las aprensiones planteadas por las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en Paraguay sobre el posible impacto de la “Ley de Control, Transparencia y Rendición de Cuentas de las Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro” sobre su capacidad de operar libremente y sobre los derechos fundamentales de asociación, expresión y privacidad.
In Paraguay, Municipal Development Councils give citizens a greater say in projects that impact their local communities.
Learn how OGP members are improving meritorious, transparent judicial appointments and judicial accountability and independence.
Read how OGP members are improving transparency and public oversight of their penitentiary systems
Learn how OGP members are improving transparency and public oversight of their use of pretrial detention.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close