Skip Navigation

Senegal

  • Member Since 2018
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 8
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Senegal’s first OGP action plan brought together the Senegalese open government community around concrete reforms. However, the action plan achieved limited completion and no notable results. The OGP host institution had limited ability to convene and fund OGP activities and faced co-ordination challenges with key partners, which delayed the start of implementation. Looking ahead, the Government of Senegal can consider how to best locate and formalize OGP to ensure action plans lead to results. (More)

Senegal has delivered its 2023-2025 action plan.


Point of Contact

Arona SARR Director of Good Governance Promotion, Ministry of Justice doudoumounasali@gmail.com

Commitments


Resources

  1. Senegal Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  2. Senegal Results Report 2021-2023

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Senegal Results Report 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Senegal Action Plan 2023-2025 (December)

    2024, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Senegal Co-Creation Brief 2023

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Senegal – Eligibility Review Letter – June 2023

    2023, Letter, Web page

  7. Senegal – Eligibility Review Letter (September 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  8. Senegal Action Plan Review 2021-2023

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Senegal Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Senegal Action Plan 2021-2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  11. Senegal – Cohort Shift Letter – February 2020

    2020, Letter, Web page

  12. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

  13. Senegal – Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2018, Letter, Web Page

  14. Senegal – Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2018, Letter, Web page


OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Aidan Apolitical photo

The Low-Tech Way to Engage Citizens in Lockdown

It seems odd to promote citizen participation at a time of lockdown. By early April 2020, “more than 3.9 billion people, or half of the world's population, [had] been asked or ordered to stay at home by their governments to prevent the spread of the deadly Covid-19 virus.”

Open Government Partnership