Beneficial Ownership Registry (UA0076)
Overview
At-a-Glance
Action Plan: Ukraine Action Plan 2018-2020
Action Plan Cycle: 2018
Status:
Institutions
Lead Institution: MoJ MoF State Fiscal Service State Service of Financial Monitoring National Agency of Ukraine for Finding, Tracing and Management of Assets Derived from Corruption and Other Crimes State e-Government Agency
Support Institution(s): Transparency International Ukraine, Government-Civic Initiative “Together against Corruption,” International Renaissance Foundation, Anti-Corruption Action Centre, other CSOs and international organizations (upon their consent)
Policy Areas
Anti Corruption and Integrity, Beneficial Ownership, Private SectorIRM Review
IRM Report: Ukraine Transitional Results Report 2018-2020, Ukraine Design Report 2018-2020
Early Results: No IRM Data
Design i
Verifiable: Yes
Relevant to OGP Values: Yes
Ambition (see definition): High
Implementation i
Description
Launching a mechanism to verify information on final beneficiaries Nowadays, the effective law requests the legal entities to identify its final beneficiary, regularly update and store information about him/her and provide it to the state registrar in cases and scope stipulated by law. Information on final beneficiaries is accessible in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, Private Entrepreneurs and 13 NGOs (hereinafter – the Register), but it is incomplete and displayed in a non-structured way there. Moreover, Ukraine lacks a mechanism to verify information from the Register. Namely, it does not specify an authority that is authorized to conduct such verifications as well as reasons therefor. On 22 May 2017, the MoJ, State e-Government Agency, Transparency International Ukraine and OрenOwnershiр Consortium signed the Memorandum of Understanding that identifies joint action on transferring information on beneficiary ownership from the Register to the Global Beneficial Ownership Register. Actions Responsible Timeframe Partners Indicator 1. Updating software of the Register so that it separately displays information on a founder and a final beneficiary owner (controller) of a legal entity MoJ MoF State Fiscal Service State Service of Financial Monitoring National Agency of Ukraine for Finding, Tracing and Management of Assets Derived from Corruption and Other Crimes State e-Government Agency December 2018 – March 2019 Transparency International Ukraine, Government-Civic Initiative “Together against Corruption,” International Renaissance Foundation, Anti-Corruption Action Centre, other CSOs and international organizations (upon their consent) Data on beneficiary owners of legal entities in the Unified State Register are adapted for integration to the Global Beneficial Ownership Register 2. Drafting proposals on a mechanism to verify information on beneficiary owners from the Register -//- December 2018 – December 2019 -//- A concept of a mechanism to verify information on beneficiary owners from the Register is developed Expected results of this activity are transferring information from the Register to the Global Beneficial Ownership Register; introducing verification of information on final beneficiary owners; preventing and countering laundering of the proceeds of crime, financing terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
IRM Midterm Status Summary
7. Launch the mechanism of verifying final beneficiaries
Language of the commitment as it appears in the action plan: Launching a mechanism to verify information on final beneficiaries [58]
Nowadays, the effective law requests the legal entities to identify its final beneficiary, regularly update and store information about him/her and provide it to the state registrar in cases and scope stipulated by law. Information on final beneficiaries is accessible in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, Private Entrepreneurs and NGOs (hereinafter – the Register), but it is incomplete and displayed in a non-structured way there. Moreover, Ukraine lacks a mechanism to verify information from the Register. Namely, it does not specify an authority that is authorized to conduct such verifications as well as reasons therefor.
On 22 May 2017, the MoJ, State e-Government Agency, Transparency International Ukraine and OрenOwnershiр Consortium signed the Memorandum of Understanding that identifies joint action on transferring information on beneficiary ownership from the Register to the Global Beneficial Ownership Register.
Milestones:
- Updating software of the Register so that it separately displays information on a founder and a final beneficiary owner (controller) of a legal entity
- Drafting proposals on a mechanism to verify information on beneficiary owners from the Register
Start Date: December 2018
End Date: December 2019
Context and objectives
Information on the ultimate beneficial owners of companies in Ukraine is disclosed in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, Private Entrepreneurs and NGOs (Register). [59] However, this Register has several flaws, including incomplete information displayed in non-structured ways, [60] irregular updating, [61] insufficient and questionable information, [62] and no mechanism to verify insufficient and questionable information. [63] The law imposes fines for not submitting information to the Register, but few fines have been applied in practice. Also, there are no sanctions for submitting incorrect information to the Register.
Some civil society representatives believe that the existing flaws allow the concealment of ultimate beneficial owners. According to an interviewed representative from the Anticorruption Action Centre (ANTAC), [64] some Ukrainian companies have intentionally disguised their real owners. [65] Many companies often submit incorrect information about their beneficial owners or do not submit any information at all. [66]
This commitment aims to launch a mechanism to verify the accuracy of the Register’s beneficial ownership information by updating its software. The linked performance indicators are specific enough to verify, and because this initiative implies a more precise disclosure of data on registered entities online, it is relevant to OGP values of access to information and technology and innovation.
The verification of information on the Register continues from Commitment 5 from the previous action plan (2016−2018). While some progress was made, including the passage of a regulation to comply with global open data standards, the software to search and display relations between ultimate beneficial owners was not developed. [67] The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) expects this current commitment will result in accurate and up-to-date information on ultimate beneficial owners in the updated Register, [68] which could help prevent and counter laundering of criminal proceeds. [69] If fully implemented, this commitment could have a transformative impact in allowing accuracy verification of companies’ ultimate beneficial owners included in the register.
Next steps
Experts from civil society advise the MoJ to introduce unique identifiers for individuals and to establish annual mandatory updates of the Register data. [70]
For effective verification, multiple mechanisms could be used to verify information on beneficial owners from the Register. These include automatic checks against risk-indicators, feedback from banks, and cross-checks with other registries. The Cabinet of Ministers could prepare a draft regulation specifying agencies and their roles for verification.
IRM End of Term Status Summary
7. Launch the mechanism of verifying final beneficiaries
Completion: Limited
The register now displays separate fields for founders and ultimate beneficial owners, [90] following a software update. [91] This information is free to access, [92] but it displays the data fields separately only if those fields have been updated by the registered entity since the software update. [93] It remains unclear whether, or to what extent, new and accurate information is available.
The working group holding responsibility has not yet published the concept paper on this, [94] and no further steps have been taken. [95] Database registrars and government entities responsible for ensuring the veracity of the data submitted, therefore, do not have updated guidelines for verifying data. [96]