Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability (UK0100)
Overview
At-a-Glance
Action Plan: United Kingdom Action Plan 2021-2023
Action Plan Cycle: 2021
Status:
Institutions
Lead Institution:
Support Institution(s):
Policy Areas
Automated Decision-Making, Digital Governance, Public ParticipationIRM Review
IRM Report: United Kingdom Action Plan Review 2021-2023
Early Results: Pending IRM Review
Design i
Verifiable: Yes
Relevant to OGP Values: Yes
Ambition (see definition): Low
Implementation i
Completion: Pending IRM Review
Description
Objective To help ensure that when advanced algorithmic systems are purchased, developed or used to support decision making that there are appropriate, clear and effective mechanisms for citizens to challenge those decisions.
What is the problem that the commitment will address? Various government departments use advanced algorithms to improve public services. To help build trust, the government is piloting transparency reporting methods for algorithmic tools used to assist decisions. While the Algorithmic Transparency Data Standard is expected to be helpful, civil society has expressed concerns that the mechanisms to enable people to challenge algorithm-assisted decisions, or information on whether algorithms are used in a particular context, are not clearly signposted in the places that people need them, and are not always effective.
How will the commitment contribute to solving the problem? By making appeal mechanisms for algorithm-assisted decisions more visible this commitment will: ● help people get access to public services to which they are entitled ● help intermediary groups support individuals and communities ● support teams that develop public services and advise on public policy to procure, design, build and operate responsible and trustworthy algorithmic systems
Milestones for discovery are detailed in the table below, however this may in the long-term lead to further actions, for example: ● campaigns to raise public awareness of existing mechanisms ● work with the general public and civil society organisations, particularly civil society organisations that work on frontline with historically unheard groups ● create and update guidance for teams developing public services and advising on public policy Milestones to fulfil the commitment New or ongoing Start Date End Date Work with internal and New March 2022 Jan 2023 external stakeholders to gauge the feasibility of conducting a scoping exercise focused on mapping existing legal requirements for appeal mechanisms, for example due to administrative law, data protection law, or domain-specific legislation; with a view to sharing this information with the public Engage with stakeholders and external experts to research public awareness and perceptions of existing accountability mechanisms New April 2022 March 2022
IRM Midterm Status Summary
Action Plan Review
Commitment 3. Algorithmic transparency and accountability
● Verifiable: Yes
● Does it have an open government lens? Yes
● Potential for results: Unclear