Transparency of Official Development Assistance (UK0104)
Overview
At-a-Glance
Action Plan: United Kingdom Action Plan 2021-2023
Action Plan Cycle: 2021
Status:
Institutions
Lead Institution:
Support Institution(s):
Policy Areas
Aid, Fiscal Openness, Public Participation, Publication of Budget/Fiscal InformationIRM Review
IRM Report: Pending IRM Review
Early Results: Pending IRM Review
Design i
Verifiable: Pending IRM Review
Relevant to OGP Values: Pending IRM Review
Ambition (see definition): Pending IRM Review
Implementation i
Completion: Pending IRM Review
Description
Objective: Strengthening of transparency and accountability of UK Official Development Assistance (ODA).
What is the problem that the commitment will address? Official development assistance (ODA) has a role to play in strengthening open societies and democracy around the world, as laid out in the International Development Strategy. Ensuring information on ODA is easier to access, understand and use means that taxpayers in donor countries, and communities and governments in developing countries can more easily hold development partners to account for using funds wisely. It also enables international development actors to coordinate and plan their activities more effectively. The UK has a strong reputation of supporting international transparency initiatives and set a high standard for transparency of ODA, with substantial progress made in the last decade. Since 2020 there have been a range of challenges to transparency and accountability in the international development sector.
In the UK: - Due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public finances, from 2021 the UK Government temporarily reduced its ODA budget from 0.7% to 0.5% of GNI. The National Audit Office echoed findings of both ICAI and the IDC that a lack of transparency in the approach to and outcome of ODA changes affected the quality and scrutiny of allocation decisions and contributed to uncertainty in the sector. - The Department for International Development (DFID) and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) were merged to form the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). The two departments were assessed in the Aid Transparency Index in 2020 with DFID scoring Very Good (85.4 and FCO scoring fair (48.6). In 2022 the FCDO scored Good (71.9). - Ten UK government departments involved in spending UK ODA were assessed in the 2020 UK Aid Transparency Review and proposals for improvements were made, but work on these proposals has been challenging under the pandemic and limited progress has been made.
Globally: The Covid-19 pandemic and the conflicts in Afghanistan and Ukraine put a spotlight on both real-time ODA data being published to IATI as a critical mechanism for understanding where humanitarian and development finance was flowing to enable coordination, effectiveness and accountability, alongside the challenges of our public data putting people at risk. Both these areas need to be explored further to ensure good quality and timely data, while minimising risk during a crisis.
How will the commitment contribute to solving the problem:
1. The International Development Strategy notes that “Transparency and accountability supports progress”, commits the UK to being “a patient partner that champions openness” and to being transparent in its financing model. This National Action Plan commitment reaffirms the UK government’s position on aid transparency and to publication of financial and programme information on ODA on devtracker and to the International Aid Transparency Initiative standard (IATI). Through the enhancement of UK aid data and encouragement and support to recipients of UK aid and partner countries, these improvements will contribute to UK ODA being tracked through the delivery chain.
2. FCDO will exceed its 2022 score in future Aid Transparency Index assessments. FCDO and BEIS will proactively engage with the recommendations of the 2022 Aid Transparency Index.
3. To enhance UK government wide aid transparency Government Departments will agree how they will address the recommendations of the 2020 UK Aid Transparency Review, with the expectation for a follow up review.
4. FCDO will create a new programme to enable aid transparency, including to support the International Aid transparency Initiative and support the enhanced transparency of UK ministries spending ODA. The UK will continue taking an active role in IATI, including through the donor harmonisation group, helping improve the standard while supporting improvements in data use and data quality.
5. FCDO will proactively engage with the recommendations of the ICAI rapid review of Transparency in UK Aid, and use them to inform its aid transparency plans for the future.
6. FCDO will adopt a meaningful, inclusive and deliberative approach to ensure effective engagement with civil society. This requires being open and accountable, ensuring participants are kept informed; and creating a well-structured and consistent process.
7. FCDO will work with donor partners on the transparency of data during conflicts, identifying best practice that balances the need for protecting people from harm with the need for data and transparency of aid information.
Milestone to fulfil the commitment Baseline New or ongoing Start Date End Date
Milestones relating to commitment 1 By December 2022 to have held a technical discussion with civil society on FCDO data and how it translates into IATI data, in particular including discussions and proposals on handling of budgets and commitments in line with the IATI standard. New 2022 Dec 2022 By August 2023, FCDO to be consistently (for at least 3 consecutive months by milestone end date) publishing all project level expenditure data monthly, within 2 weeks of the month end. FCDO publishing both monthly and quarterly. Ongoing 2022 August 31st 2023 By Sept 2023, FCDO to ensure all activity descriptions of projects and programmes provide an overview of implementing activities and target groups Sept 2023
Milestones relating to commitment 2 FCDO will improve its score by the time of the Aid Transparency Index in 2024 . Score of 71.9 (Good) in 2022 Ongoing 2022 2024
Milestones relating to commitment 3 By December 2022, FCDO and BEIS to outline actions to be taken to address recommendations of the 2022 Aid Transparency Index NA New 2022 December 31st 2022. By end 2022, OGDs to have agreed a process for addressing outstanding challenges highlighted in the 2020 UK Aid Transparency Review and agreed the timeline for a future assessment. NA New 2022 Dec 31st 2022
Milestones relating to commitment 4 FCDO to publish the business case of the new transparency programme and plan to support IATI and the transparency of OGDs NA New Sept 2022 March 2023
Milestones relating to commitment 5 The UK government to respond to the ICAI review within allocated timeframes, outlining actions that will be taken in response to recommendations. NA New 2022 Within agreed timelines from ICAI review publication
Milestones relating to commitment 6 FCDO to hold quarterly meetings with civil society to discuss aid transparency, seeking input from and consulting civil society organisations on pertinent issues, and providing feedback on how the input is used. NA New Autum n 2022 Ongoing
Milestones relating to commitment 7 FCDO to work with other IATI donor publishers to develop an approach to IATI publication during conflicts. NA New 2022 March 2023