Skip Navigation

 

Lobbying

Lobbying is an essential component of democracy, as people must be able to talk directly to officials about issues of interest. Clear rules are needed, however, to ensure ethical interactions, encourage fairness of access to decision makers, and allow people to understand how decisions are being made. Lobbying regulations can set standards of conduct and mandate the collection and publication of data, such as who lobbyists are, which public officials they meet with, and how these meetings may have influenced decision-making.

Open Gov Challenge: Anti-Corruption

With OGP’s 2023-2028 Strategy, OGP members are set to work toward a number of aspirational thematic reforms through the Open Gov Challenge. This section of the Open Gov Guide addresses Anti-Corruption,

Challenge prompt: Develop, strengthen, and/or implement a whole-of-government anti-corruption legislation, strategy or roadmap.

Actions and reforms that fit within the scope of this challenge should include at least one of the following areas:

  • Beneficial ownership
  • Open contracting
  • Political finance and asset and interest disclosure
  • Lobbying
  • Integrity systems at local level
  • Extractive industry transparency

Through this challenge, governments can improve policy, implementation and interoperability (including through OGP) across the areas above.


Key Terms

Definitions for key terms such as lobbying data and lobbying registers.

  • Lobbying: Lobbying is any activity carried out to influence a government or institution’s policies and decisions in favor of a specific cause or outcome. Lobbying is a legitimate activity and an important part of the democratic process.
  • Lobbying data: Key data elements include the following:
    • Unique identifiers for lobbyists and public officials
    • Clear identifying information for lobbying clients
    • Details on interactions between lobbyists and public officials
    • Details on lobbyists’ goals
    • Date and time of interactions
    • Topic of interactions
    • Money spent on lobbyists’ interactions
  • Lobbying register: A digital register is where all individuals and organizations that engage in lobbying must sign up to conduct their lobbying activities. In many countries, officials will also record meetings.

The Evidence

Lobbying regulations can make the policy process more transparent, participatory, and accountable to the public interest.

  • Public lobbying data has been shown to support accountability by allowing oversight bodies and the public to flag conflicts of interest and corruption. This is especially effective when lobbying data is combined with political finance data and legislative voting records.
  • Efforts to ensure equal access to decision makers can increase the number and diversity of interests in meetings between the public and government officials.
  • Judicial reviews strengthen rule-making transparency and oversight by determining whether a government body reached an administrative decision through a legal, reasoned process.
  • Allowing the public, civil society organizations, investors, and corporate shareholders to investigate interest groups increases public oversight of lobbying, as seen in the area of climate lobbying.

Reform Guidance

The recommendations below represent reforms that national and local governments, representatives of civil society organizations, and others can consider for their action plans and the Open Gov Challenge. The reforms are categorized according to OGP’s principal values: transparency, civic participation, and public accountability. Reforms should be adapted to fit the domestic context, and involve and coordinate with other levels and branches of government.

Reforms across policy areas are also tagged by the estimated degree of difficulty in implementation. Though progress is often not linear, the recommendations have been categorized using these labels to give the reader a sense of how different reforms can work together to raise the ambition of open government approaches.

Recommended Reforms Key

  • Transparency: Transparency empowers citizens to exercise their rights, hold the government accountable, and participate in decision-making processes. Examples of relevant activities include the proactive or reactive publication of government-held information, legal or institutional frameworks to strengthen the right to access information, and disclosing information using open data standards.

  • Civic Participation: When people are engaged, governments and public institutions are more responsive, innovative, and effective. Examples of relevant initiatives include new or improved processes and mechanisms for the public to contribute to decisions, participatory mechanisms to involve underrepresented groups in policy making, and a legal environment that guarantees civil and political rights.

  • Public Accountability: Public accountability occurs when public institutions must justify their actions, act upon requirements and criticisms, and take responsibility for failure to perform according to laws or commitments. Importantly, public accountability means that members of the public can also access and trigger accountability mechanisms. Examples of relevant activities include citizen audits of performance, new or improved mechanisms or institutions that respond to citizen-initiated appeals processes, and improved access to justice.

  • Inclusion: Inclusion is fundamental to achieving more equitable, representative, and accountable policies that truly serve all people. This includes increasing the voice, agency, and influence of historically discriminated or underrepresented groups. Depending on the context, traditionally underrepresented groups may experience discrimination based on gender, sexual identity, race, ethnicity, age, geography, differing ability, legal, or socioeconomic status.

  • Foundational: This tag is used for reforms that are the essential building blocks of a policy area. “Foundational” does not mean low ambition or low impact. These recommendations often establish basic legal frameworks and institutional structures.

  • Intermediate: This tag is used for reforms that are complex and often involve coordination and outreach between branches, institutions, and levels of government, with the public or between countries.

  • Advanced: This tag is used for reforms that close important loopholes to make existing work more effective and impactful. Specifically, “Advanced” reforms are particularly ambitious, innovative or close important loopholes to make existing work more effective, impactful or sustainable. They are often applied in mature environments where they seek to institutionalize a good practice that has already shown results.

  • Executive: The executive branch of government is responsible for designing, implementing, and enforcing laws, policies, and initiatives. It is typically led by the head of state or government, such as a president or prime minister, along with their appointed cabinet members. The executive branch’s functions also include overseeing the day-to-day operations of the government, managing foreign affairs, and directing the country’s armed forces. In democratic systems, the executive branch is accountable to the legislature and the electorate, with its powers and limitations outlined in the constitution or legal framework of the respective country.

  • Legislative: The legislative branch of government is responsible for making laws and regulations and overseeing the functioning of the government. It typically consists of a body of elected representatives, such as a parliament, congress, or assembly, which is tasked with proposing, debating, amending, and ultimately passing legislation. The legislative branch plays a crucial role in representing the interests of the people, as its members are elected to office by the public. In addition to law-making, this branch often holds the power to levy taxes, allocate funds, and conduct certain investigations into matters of public concern. The structure and powers of the legislative branch are usually outlined in a country’s constitution or legal framework, and it serves as a check on the executive and judicial branches to ensure a system of checks and balances within a state.

Examples of Reforms from OGP and Beyond

The following examples are commitments previously made within or beyond OGP that demonstrate elements of the recommendations made above. Lobbying commitments remain somewhat rare in OGP, with 22 members making 34 commitments over OGP’s first twelve years. However, when OGP members do implement lobbying reforms, they tend to have significant results.

OGP Reforms
  • CHILE Open Lobbying Data: Enacted legislation to modernize its lobbying system, which led to the creation of a lobbying website where citizens can now access thousands of open data records on lobbying activity, hearings, travel, and donor information.
  • ESTONIA Tracking Influence through Lobbying Meetings: Began publishing quarterly data on lobbying meetings with ministers and high-level public officials. Civil society and journalists have begun to use this data to track which interest groups have influenced policy processes.
  • FRANCE Mandatory Lobbying Register Began requiring the registration of lobbyists on a portal that is updated annually and in an open data format as part of a longer process to increase lobbying transparency. Committed to using the portal to provide transparency on how lobbying shapes decision-making on laws and regulations.
  • IRELAND Mandatory Lobbying Register Created a mandatory, public lobbying register that allows citizens to search by dates of lobbyist registration, policy area, lobbying organization, and names of specific public officials.
  • LATVIA Lobbying Transparency Regulations: Adopted regulations, such as increasing the public’s access to lobbying data and publishing information on the meetings of certain public officials, among other measures, which entered into force in early 2023.
  • MADRID, SPAIN Mandatory Lobbying Register Created a mandatory lobbying register to disclose any public meetings with the city council, which also allows the public to subscribe to alerts, view official calendars, and request meetings with their representatives. By January 2023, over 850 lobbyists had registered.
Beyond OGP Action Plans
  • CANADA Lobbying Disclosure Requirements: Requires lobbyists to disclose any communications meant to influence public officials, including “grassroots communication” such as social media, and to publish monthly communication reports that include their objectives, meetings with public officials, and specific policies targeted by their activities.
  • GERMANY Business Support for Lobbying Registry Legislation: Passed a law in January 2022 to establish the country’s first lobbying register through advocacy from the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency coalition, which was formed with some of Germany’s most powerful business lobbies.
  • ITALY Ministry-Specific Lobbying Registry: Created a registry requiring lobbyists to first register before scheduling meetings with high-ranking officials in the Ministry of Economic Development. Published meeting agendas for the highest-ranked positions and registered over 1,300 lobbyists by September 2018.

Who is working on this topic?

C
Chile Chile
Colombia Colombia
Costa Rica Costa Rica
Croatia Croatia
E
Estonia Estonia
F
Finland Finland
France France
G
Georgia Georgia
Greece Greece
I
Ireland Ireland
Italy Italy
J
Jalisco, Mexico
L
Latvia Latvia
M
Madrid, Spain
Mongolia Mongolia
N
North Macedonia North Macedonia
P
Paraguay Paraguay
Q
Quito, Ecuador
R
Romania Romania
S
Spain Spain
U
United States United States
V
Valencian Community, Spain

This list reflects members with commitments in the “Lobbying” policy area of the Data Dashboard.


Active OGP Partners

The following organizations have recently worked on this issue in the context of OGP at the national or international level. They may have additional insights on the topic. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. If you are interested in national-level initiatives, please contact research@opengovpartnership.org.


Benchmarking Data

The OGP 2023-2028 Strategy sets out the Open Gov Challenge and aims to provide clear benchmarks for performance through reliable data.

While benchmarks for individual countries and Open Gov Guide recommendations are not yet integrated, for this chapter, interested individuals may rely on the following data sets:

  • In collaboration with the OGP Support Unit, AccessInfo Europe, and Transparency International, the Data for Development Network’s Global Data Barometer collects information on whether lobbying data is available in open formats. Visualizations of this data are available on the OGP website.
  • OGP commitments on this topic can be found on the Data Dashboard.

Guidance & Standards

While the list below is not exhaustive, it aims to provide a range of recommendations, standards, and analysis to guide reform in this policy area.

  • The Good Lobby tracker collects best practices in the corporate political space based on voluntary initiatives, including ESG rating providers, sustainability metrics, and other standards (such as that of the OECD listed above).
  • The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI), a UN-supported network of private sector actors, has developed recommendations to create a policy environment that supports responsible lobbying, particularly related to climate lobbying. The UN PRI also outlines a set of common, voluntary standards, such as in quarterly or annual financial filings, though a growing number of governments and financial regulators are requiring such disclosures as part of regular corporate reporting requirements. Moreover, an increasing number of countries are also empowering shareholders to demand such disclosures.
  • Transparency International has also made recommendations for expanding lobbying law coverage and disclosure to create a more comprehensive “legislative footprint” across the European Union. Transparency International has also published recommendations on lobbying-related commitments in OGP national action plans.
Open Government Partnership