IRM

In 2020, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) published the Design Report for Albania's fourth action plan (2018-2020). The report covers the development of the action plan and the design of its commitments. In Albania, the IRM's findings are summarized below:…

In 2020, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) published the Design Report for Montenegro's second action plan (2018-2020). The report covers the development of the action plan and the design of its commitments. In Montenegro, the IRM's findings are summarized below:…

Romania’s fourth action plan covers a wide range of topics, including some areas where the country has seen a decline in recent years. Notable commitments include standardizing public consultations, improving transparency of national investment funds, and simplifying monitoring of the…

In 2020, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) published the Implementation Report for Denmark's third action plan (2017-2019). The report covers the level of completion and the results of the action plan. In Denmark, the IRM researcher Mikkel Otto Hansen (Nordic…

In 2020, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) published the Design Report for Moldova's fourth action plan (2019-2020). The report covers the development of the action plan and the design of its commitments. In Moldova, the IRM's findings are summarized below:…

The co-creation process of Paraguay’s fourth action plan was highly collaborative, resulting in a plan that engages all three branches of government and covers the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. However, due to an overlap with national elections, the process faced…

La Libertad’s 2018-2020 action plan presents an opportunity to improve citizen participation in the region via the platform “Decide La Libertad”. Citizens provided inputs during the co-creation process of the action plan, but the government did not publish a reasoned…

El Salvador’s fourth action plan is aligned with the country’s national priorities, including fiscal transparency, accountability, and human rights. The co-creation process included a broad, open consultation and the Government responded to the input presented by civil society organizations and…

The majority of the commitments in Peru’s third action plan are verifiable and of moderate potential impact. However, its co-creation process did not include a feedback mechanism for the public justifying the acceptance or rejection of civil society contributions. In…

Georgia’s fourth action plan includes initiatives undertaken by the central government, the Parliament, and several local municipalities. Despite the range of topics covered, many commitments aim for minor improvements and do not clearly align with stakeholder priorities identified during the…